You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
I read them all except your last one aboveDon't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
Stoned Rose
Well-Known Member
Aside from the cunts I’ve got on ignore, probably yes.Don't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
calumdown
Well-Known Member
if you haven't you're not a true blue.Don't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 23,923
- Location
- Doublethink
- Team supported
- Super City from Maine Road(not wolves)
In an ideal world sure but we are talking about football politics and the future of the club resting on a 3 man tribunal. CAS had a similar 3 man panel and 1 still sided with uefa despite the report stating 12 times that no evidence of disguised owner funding was proven.I think you are confusing the two, why do City need to have heard anything to be confident? The case has finished, we will now know all the evidence, if any, the premier league has. We are most probably confident because seeing the evidence we know there is no chance they can prove guilt.
The arena is insufficient to deal with serious allegations of fraud. Again I get the confidence.
My point is more to do with the leaks. Having read most of this thread, the charges are very serious and the bar so high that proving we did what’s alleged is very slim to no chance. So yes I get the confidence element again from the outset.
We either know or the club is in the dark regarding a verdict. The lawyers can be confident but again unless they have read the verdict then in the dark like the rest of us.
Can the club and its general counsel be that confident despite not knowing the verdict and despite all of the above?
Someone must be talking for city to act in this way. It’s only my thoughts today. Probably load of bull.
Yes with transfers
Yes with Haaland deal
Yes with stadium expansion
Yes because we have not broken any legal or financial rules.
Yes Cliff has rocked up with his blue balls out -:)
Last edited:
Bodicoteblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 6,052
I didn’t read the first one, so I’ve no idea what this thread is about.Don't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2019
- Messages
- 33,084
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Aside from the cunts I’ve got on ignore, probably yes.
Mother!!
Is that you?
Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 4,445
Nick Harris has.Don't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,884
Not uncommon in jury trials (which this obviously isnt). Until the full verdict, both sides are still playing the odds. The case and how it went is relevant information and would swing any settlement offer, but no guarantee.
It’s not happening unless the premier league are desperate to keep the findings silent & it’s not in our interests.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
No he was there at the same time. He left in 86. I think Oldham was glad to let him go as his dad always said he was a bit of a 'party boy'.Were you at Oldham after your cousin was there?
Barcon
Well-Known Member
I just deleted the post. I thought you might not want personal stuff out there.No he was there at the same time. He left in 86. I think Oldham was glad to let him go as his dad always said he was a bit of a 'party boy'.
I still remember his sister fondly ; )
This thread is the internet equivalent of being at york awayif you haven't you're not a true blue.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
No probs mate, i think I might have mentioned on here he was my cousin a few times :)I just deleted the post. I thought you might not want personal stuff out there.
I still remember his sister fondly ; )
Cousin Paula. Ah yes!
I have read every single one. took a course in speed reading and it really worked, I read War and Peace in two hours. It's about Russia.-Don't lie!
And fair play if you have.
9,851 pages.
98,502 posts including this one.
Has anyone read every single post?
You know the rules pics.No probs mate, i think I might have mentioned on here he was my cousin a few times :)
Cousin Paula. Ah yes!
manimanc
Well-Known Member
The police currently have the photos.You know the rules pics.
Sorry :)
roy.or.r
Well-Known Member
why does everyone here keep mentioning War and Peace? It’s a shit novel.
Lost for words
Well-Known Member
Whatever happens we should be going for that shit stirring website 365 football which must be making a mint out of this. If it is based offshore then we probably can't get them but we still have to try as it doesn't do anyone any good but it does give the gloating masses plenty of ammo while at the same time leaves anyone with allegiances to our club with a pall of depression.
It would be a help of course if Masters was to get on with it but the longer this goes on, the longer he picks up his payslip. If the judgement goes against him, the likelihood of long term unemployment grows. And with him will be quite a few CEOs of other clubs who may be involved in this affair.
It would be a help of course if Masters was to get on with it but the longer this goes on, the longer he picks up his payslip. If the judgement goes against him, the likelihood of long term unemployment grows. And with him will be quite a few CEOs of other clubs who may be involved in this affair.