The Labour Government

Oh dear. I see you, cropping the Torygraph logo off this and presenting it as bona fide news! Let's face it, anyone going to Chris Philp for a comment needs certifying.
I can say with total impunity that this government has deported infinitely more people than the last one did to Rwanda, yet Philp is still dribbling on about it even now, through teary eyes!
Oh dear ……
That’s it , let’s turn on the condescending tone , fancy being concerned about immigration.. it’s all in hand ….
So as for the Telegraph , the header is cropped off or the file is too big .
Your implication is that the information is not bona Fide .
So come on , which of those numbers is incorrect ?
What information is not bona fide ?
Just answer factually please and keep the virtue signalling down to a minimum.
As for your deportation number, it is true more have left however out of the much vaunted number of 24,000 only 6,339 have been forcibly removed , the rest have left themselves , probably due to Rachel Reeves’ budget - that’s one way of doing it - she is more effective than smashing the gangs.
 
Oh dear ……
That’s it , let’s turn on the condescending tone , fancy being concerned about immigration.. it’s all in hand ….
So as for the Telegraph , the header is cropped off or the file is too big .
Your implication is that the information is not bona Fide .
So come on , which of those numbers is incorrect ?
What information is not bona fide ?
Just answer factually please and keep the virtue signalling down to a minimum.
As for your deportation number, it is true more have left however out of the much vaunted number of 24,000 only 6,339 have been forcibly removed , the rest have left themselves , probably due to Rachel Reeves’ budget - that’s one way of doing it - she is more effective than smashing the gangs.
So 6,339 more than the Tories' hugely expensive but epic failure of a Rwanda policy saw deported then? Jog on!
 
So 6,339 more than the Tories' hugely expensive but epic failure of a Rwanda policy saw deported then? Jog on!
lol …
Same old ….if condescension doesn’t work let’s get aggressive.
Is that it then?
No come back on the numbers you claimed weren’t bona fide ?
Didn’t think so.
As for “6,339 more than the tories” - that is pathetic and untrue and you know it.
Run along , back to the Trump thread where you can have unlimited free hits and feel good about yourself .
 
Great headline.

In the grand scheme of things, the number of people coming over in small boats is minute.

Still, creates a narrative.

Until people want to actually have an adult conversation about it, the headlines will continue as stopping the boats is impossible without a deal with France.
Some people are just so gullible and will react to any headline that fits their narrative. Cringeworthy and embarassing.......
 
Some people are just so gullible and will react to any headline that fits their narrative. Cringeworthy and embarassing.......
The whole thread is. Even if you hate everything about this Labour government, the truth is that they’re infinitely better than any alternative at the moment, so whining about 6k more people arriving on boats when the alternative is dismantling the NHS and trying to copy what Trump is doing makes all whining about smaller matters moot.
 
Do you really have to ask?
You told us you voted for them. Have you had the opportunity to withdraw your vote or something?
You’re in denial.
You clearly are incapable of comprehending conversation and debate. Yes. I voted for them and I would do again in the absence of any other party worthy of a vote. It is/was a protest vote. Prepare yourself for many millions of protest votes. But of course everyone that doesn't vote Labour are wrong aren't they.... ?
 
Does the government set the prices retailers can sell at to the public?

Will these saving be passed on in full to us?

It’s yet another false claim until such a point we can actually see the difference in our pockets.

No. That’s the function of the marketplace.

The measure is as much about helping businesses as it is the consumer. Again, the market will determine if discounts are passed onto consumers.
 
No. That’s the function of the marketplace.

The measure is as much about helping businesses as it is the consumer. Again, the market will determine if discounts are passed onto consumers.

I know Bob.

The headline of “government cuts the price of everyday essentials” is basically bullshit.

The cost of living crises is going nowhere.
 
You clearly are incapable of comprehending conversation and debate. Yes. I voted for them and I would do again in the absence of any other party worthy of a vote. It is/was a protest vote. Prepare yourself for many millions of protest votes. But of course everyone that doesn't vote Labour are wrong aren't they.... ?
If you vote Labour you have supported them.
If you vote Conservative you have supported them.
If you vote Reform you have supported them.

Not sure what’s so difficult to understand.

You can tell yourself it was a protest vote all you want but it counts exactly the same as any other Reform voter’s vote, ergo you supported them.
 
If you vote Labour you have supported them.
If you vote Conservative you have supported them.
If you vote Reform you have supported them.

Not sure what’s so difficult to understand.

You can tell yourself it was a protest vote all you want but it counts exactly the same as any other Reform voter’s vote, ergo you supported them.
Oh okay you win..... infantile and pathetic!

Just prepare yourself for the UK Public telling the Labour party and the Tory Party they are unfit for office.
 
Oh okay you win..... infantile and pathetic!

Just prepare yourself for the UK Public telling the Labour party and the Tory Party they are unfit for office.
What’s infantile and pathetic is how anyone can think a protest vote is anything other than support for what you voted for. Especially since Brexit and Trump.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top