I just got here :)This all day. This thread is full of the same right wing cunts who love Boris and defend trump. It’s all about division.
I just got here :)This all day. This thread is full of the same right wing cunts who love Boris and defend trump. It’s all about division.
Their controlling husbands were hiding behind them.Those celebrating in court were almost all women.
If you look closely you can see their gammon complexion and shaven heads the misogynistic transphobic racist status quo t shirt wearing curly haired hating cunts.Their controlling husbands were hiding behind them.
I don't think this is true even if I thought it was ok to give kids hormone blockers. If a woman has a hysterectomy does she become a man? My sperm has higher concentrations of estrogen then my blood. Is my sperm more female than my blood?Two points to be made here
If a boy has hormone blockers and so dont go through puberty means they have no more strength or testorone than women born as women , they are on oestrogen and those who have gender reasignment have their bits removed that produce male hormones and that renders them as female as women born as women
I'm sure you are well aware of the Sutton Utd Vs Ebbsfleet cancellation? You are aware that the FA are now sending observer's to women's games where trans are playing to make sure the real women are safe? There's been numerous situations where women have refused to play against trans opponents and been abused for their actions?
You do know in professional sports women have been lobbying against trans inclusion for years but only the bravest usually ex athletes dared to speak out publicly?
You name me one professional female athlete who openly lobbies for trans inclusion in professional female sports?
BTW, who's your audience?
But trans women are not women. That was at the core of today's ruling.I'm not arguing with you about this. As I said, I'm heavily involved in women's football so I am fully aware of the instances you'd mentioned. I also know there was a lot of support for Sutton United and the player involved from within the women's football community.
It is not for you to come out and make blanket statements about what women want and who they feel safe around. The women's sporting community does not have one opinion around this.
One female athlete who lobbies for trans inclusion? Megan Rapinoe. There are lots of other players who are not "lobbying" as such but who have expressed support for the inclusion of the trans community. Lotte Wubben Moy springs to mind
My audience? People who want to watch women's football with other fans of women's football.
I follow dozens of grassroots women's football teams that are trans inclusive and they are all being very vocal in their support for their teammates this evening.
Stop pretending that cis women who support trans inclusion in sport don't exist. There's loads of us.
And biological women ie women, aren't "cis" women eitherBut trans women are not women. That was at the core of today's ruling.
Bigot!!!Thats the point in which the parents should rally together share their views then approach the school to discuss - I am certain something can be worked out such as a separate changing facility (small room somewhere ) where the tans person can change alone without bothering the rest of the class.
Until people get their heads around this we cannot move forward. A person can identify as they please but they are legally what they were born as. They may hate this fact, they may feel its unfair, they may fight against it but it doesn't change the reality.But trans women are not women. That was at the core of today's ruling.
Now that I have read the judgement I see the judges went out of their way to warn against triumphalism.Yeah because the trans movement have been so nice, fair and balanced.
I'm not arguing with you about this. As I said, I'm heavily involved in women's football so I am fully aware of the instances you'd mentioned. I also know there was a lot of support for Sutton United and the player involved from within the women's football community.
It is not for you to come out and make blanket statements about what women want and who they feel safe around. The women's sporting community does not have one opinion around this.
One female athlete who lobbies for trans inclusion? Megan Rapinoe. There are lots of other players who are not "lobbying" as such but who have expressed support for the inclusion of the trans community. Lotte Wubben Moy springs to mind
My audience? People who want to watch women's football with other fans of women's football.
I follow dozens of grassroots women's football teams that are trans inclusive and they are all being very vocal in their support for their teammates this evening.
Stop pretending that cis women who support trans inclusion in sport don't exist. There's loads of us.
If that’s the Fife issue then it’s absolute nonsense. I can’t believe people give a fuck. If sue puts on some pants and wants to suffer the blokes toilets for a shite no fucker would care. No different the other way.
Some women have XY chromasomes. The athlete Gowrie Retchekan was banned from the Olympics when that was the only test. She was gorgeous too.Except for the fact that 1 in 500 men don’t have XY chromosomes and many are entirely physiologically normative. What if I told you there are conditions that lead to men having XX chromosomes that have no idea because there is nothing a-typical about them? By your definition these otherwise entirely normal men are suddenly women now.
Whatever you think about this judgment it expressly says that it doesn’t present any opinion at all on biology. It presents a strictly legal view of what constitutes the definition of a woman under the legislation put forward under the Equality Act. The decision seems fairly sober, logical and non-sensationalist - unfortunately nobody will read it. All it is doing is reaffirming that those born female constitute their own protected class and are entitled to their own spaces. It doesn’t really provide any practical solutions on how trans people are expected to live their lives - they aren’t just going to disappear, though it’s clear their very existence will upset some people.
I see the thread has already descended into made up nonsense about cats again, which is always entirely predictable and a bit boring at this point - but it’s not at all controversial to say that physiological traits will always defy people’s attempts to neatly categorise everybody into binary buckets based on overly simplistic criteria like “chromosomes”. The real world just isn’t that simple.
A natal woman. Eg not someone born a man who now believes they are a woman. Or, a womanWhat’s a cis woman?
A natal woman. Eg not someone born a man who now believes they are a woman. Or, a woman
You seem up on this case. Was the person with the cock, swinging it around or were they minding their own business and getting changed? There’s plenty folk who are uncomfortable getting changed in public and most public places have individual changing facilities.Or alternatively a person with a cock was changing in the womens and she wasn’t quite comfortable about that. By saying that she was disciplined and on the edge of being sacked. Not really on is it?
So like someone's mum, gran sister etc...A natal woman. Eg not someone born a man who now believes they are a woman. Or, a woman
Same sex spaces are legally protected. Your individual likes and dislikes largely are notYou seem up on this case. Was the person with the cock, swinging it around or were they minding their own business and getting changed? There’s plenty folk who are uncomfortable getting changed in public and most public places have individual changing facilities.
Shit we are onto the isms now.Now that I have read the judgement I see the judges went out of their way to warn against triumphalism.