Silly Bastards.What's SB?
Silly Bastards.What's SB?
Same BullshitWhat's SB?
It would put the media in a quandary would it not?Hidden below millions at Dipper parade.
If you put your chav head on, I am assuming Stamford Bridge?What's SB?
Chelsea fan.If you put your tarquin (or chav, can’t remember what terraloon is) head on, I am assuming Stamford Bridge?
Yes I just amended my post. I know there’s a pet tarquin here or hereabouts too.Chelsea fan.
Artetatechnicalarea or something like that?Yes I just amended my post. I know there’s a pet tarquin here or hereabouts too.
I will repeat this till i am blue in the face, the time taken has absolutely zero bearing on the nature of the decision, there is 115 charges all of which have to be explained and documented in a watertight fashion and the panel have to give absolute legal reasoning as to why they have come to the reasoning that they did, this document will run into 1000s of pages and be pored over and discussed in minute detail, so it stands to reason it takes the time it takes, the time has no bearing against the nature of the decision, as much as we would all like them to say masters is a chancer of a **** who went headlong into a fraudulent investigation at the behest of a bunch of corrupt cartel pricks, to put that in legalese takes time.Unfortunately I'd say the fact a decision is taking so long probably means it won't be a clearcut slam dunk for either side.
Your front room sounds busy.
10155 page's and you still don't know why it is taking so long for the outcome.Unfortunately I'd say the fact a decision is taking so long probably means it won't be a clearcut slam dunk for either side.
At times I thought this thread was the muffin debate :-)10155 page's and you still don't know why it is taking so long for the outcome.
Perhaps you would be better posting in the muffin debate .
I haven't got a chav head.:-)If you put your chav head on, I am assuming Stamford Bridge?
That’s not possible. This first case is just to decide guilt or not guilty. If guilty there will be a separate hearing to consider sanctions.A chap at SB on Saturday said it would be announced on or after 5/5. He maintained there is a cut off date for any points deduction ( I haven’t been able to find any mention of date in the PL rulebook) is 4/5.
To be honest I have heard it all before so treat it with a shovel full of salt and had forgotten about the claim till the comment re Troy Deeney
It would put the media in a quandary would it not?
;)
Why don’t you keep the BBQ in the shed instead of burying it :-)Bank holiday Monday. I will get a bottle of bubbly on ice and dig out the BBQ
D'you mean the barm debate?10155 page's and you still don't know why it is taking so long for the outcome.
Perhaps you would be better posting in the muffin debate .
Etihad CEO on Bloomberg ref IPO. No date mentioned in the interview, stated cash not needed.
I will repeat this till i am blue in the face, the time taken has absolutely zero bearing on the nature of the decision, there is 115 charges all of which have to be explained and documented in a watertight fashion and the panel have to give absolute legal reasoning as to why they have come to the reasoning that they did, this document will run into 1000s of pages and be pored over and discussed in minute detail, so it stands to reason it takes the time it takes, the time has no bearing against the nature of the decision, as much as we would all like them to say masters is a chancer of a **** who went headlong into a fraudulent investigation at the behest of a bunch of corrupt cartel pricks, to put that in legalese takes time.