Better without him at the moment. Would leave him out of the final and work out how to reintegrate him next season.
Sit on the bench and make way for MarmoushGot played in once and should have had an assist - not sure what more he can do?
This the nail on the head. Haaland would suit a counter attacking side. We are a better side without him as we are more fluid and can press better. It’s a real problem going forwardSaid at the time, signing Kane made more sense. Would have suited the way we play far more, and is also a considerably better footballer.
Haha.Got played in once and should have had an assist - not sure what more he can do?
Got played in once and should have had an assist - not sure what more he can do?
I was so against this at the time, I would have been destroyed had we signed Kane instead.... that said...Said at the time, signing Kane made more sense. Would have suited the way we play far more, and is also a considerably better footballer.
This is just bizarre. If this isn't a troll, I'd strongly suggest finding a different interest as you just dont get football in the slightest.Five wins on the trot without him.
Marmoush, our best player since he arrived, transforming the way we play, dropped .
Marmoush did more in 10 mins than Haaland all match.
Haaland touched the ball 17 times, 9 accurate passes, no shots on target, 1 off.
He just stands on the edge of the box, leaving no space for others.
Still, only another 9 years to go.
You were wrong back then, you've since been shown to be wrong and yet you still think that?Said at the time, signing Kane made more sense. Would have suited the way we play far more, and is also a considerably better footballer.