Middle East Conflict | Netanyahu orders strikes on Gaza (p1161)

BigJoe#1 said:
Hey @BlueHammer85 did I miss your reply to my question?

I was wondering how you have managed to reconcile with me being fully in line with the Labour party strategy on the Middle East and I assume you being totally out of step? You call me a fool for wanting hostages released yet that is exactly what your Labour party want. Does this mean Angela Rayner, your beloved leader Keir Starmer and the Labour party are all is a fools for wanting exactly what I was calling for?

Have to do something to stop the killings and anything is better than nothing.
Click to expand...
Look I voted for Blair and reckon he did a decent job but was totally against his and George W Bush's war.
 
Username Required said:
Israel's strikes came soon after the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) passed its first resolution in 2 decades (on June 12, 2025) labeling Iran "non-compliant" with nuclear non-proliferation norms, citing “secret nuclear activities.

www.csis.org

What Do the Israeli Strikes Mean for Iran’s Nuclear Program?

Israel launched an unprecedented attack on Iran’s nuclear and military sites. The future of Iran’s program and regional proliferation risks will depend on the success of Israel’s campaign, the international response, and Tehran’s perceived need for nuclear weapons.
www.csis.org www.csis.org

Q5: What does this mean for wider nuclear risks, such as proliferation, and the international nuclear regime?

A5: Iran was testing the global nuclear order for decades with its enrichment to 60 percent, which is well beyond the percentage required for civilian peaceful purposes. It is worth emphasizing that immediately prior to Israel’s strike, the IAEA stated that Iran was not complying with its nuclear nonproliferation obligations and passed the first resolution against the country in 20 years. Iran had also announced last week the opening of a new uranium enrichment site. But Iran is not the only country that has been testing the nuclear regime in recent years.
Click to expand...
So in short we have a rogue nuclear state imposing justice on behalf of an international agency which oversees treaties that it has never been subject to .....all in the name of compliance.

I mean we are long through the looking glass here but fucking hell.
 
The blue phantom said:
You're not aware of thousands of Palestinians held in Israeli Jails, Hundreds of children. Without any charges?

Are you taking the piss?
Click to expand...
No.... you said hostages, did you mean prisoners. I think you are buying in to all the propaganda that is being put out (on both sides I might add).

We all know that October 7th was an actual event organised by Hamas, a pretty dispicable and cruel event where people we attacked, murdered, raped and some taken hostage. If Hamas want food supplies to be resumed than they need to give up the hostages.

I don't deny that Israel are probably acting abhorently too, but to try and bring about any semblance of a peace solution then Hamas need to release the hostages... if only in hope. If you're that bothered by it maybe they can just go get some more... you know, organise another attack.
 
BigJoe#1 said:
No, the ones captured by Hamas on October 7th '24.

I don't know
Click to expand...
We established that the other week when you made a heartfelt plea to release the elderly and then sloped off for a few weeks when I pointed out that they had been released 18 months earlier.
 
BigJoe#1 said:
No.... you said hostages, did you mean prisoners. I think you are buying in to all the propaganda that is being put out (on both sides I might add).

We all know that October 7th was an actual event organised by Hamas, a pretty dispicable and cruel event where people we attacked, murdered, raped and some taken hostage. If Hamas want food supplies to be resumed than they need to give up the hostages.

I don't deny that Israel are probably acting abhorently too, but to try and bring about any semblance of a peace solution then Hamas need to release the hostages... if only in hope. If you're that bothered by it maybe they can just go get some more... you know, organise another attack.
Click to expand...
How can they be prisoners. They were grabbed off the street without any explanation why. No charges or trials.

So they are hostages?

And they are tortured and raped daily.
 
The blue phantom said:
How can they be prisoners. They were grabbed off the street without any explanation why. No charges or trials.

So they are hostages?

And they are tortured and raped daily.
Click to expand...
you know something about all these people? or are you believing all that you are told.

BTW I'm not doubting you but there are lots of stories told and not told, again on both sides. All I do know for certain is lots of people were viciously attacked in a co-ordinated military type assault by Hamas, and there has been lots of killings, on both sides as a result. It would be nice it could be halted
 
The blue phantom said:
Sunak sent the Jets over a couple of week before Labour got in power to shoot Irans drones down. There's no doubt whatsoever Starmer will fall in line when Trump orders him to do the same. As I've said on here he's already helping the Israeli's with spying missions from Cyprus with Jets flying over Gaza. Also this is the guy who went on record stating Israel have the right to withhold Food & Electricity from the Gazan population. He's a ****.
Click to expand...
A Tory ****. And you nailed him.
 
BigJoe#1 said:
you know something about all these people? or are you believing all that you are told.

BTW I'm not doubting you but there are lots of stories told and not told, again on both sides. All I do know for certain is lots of people were viciously attacked in a co-ordinated military type assault by Hamas, and there has been lots of killings, on both sides as a result. It would be nice it could be halted
Click to expand...
Believe nothing until you have actual, verifiable evidence. Putting forward a narrative, for any side, any conflict, where your biases see you accept as fact, because you agree, with other stupid cunts like you.

It's a red flag of a mind, devioud of the ability to employ critical thinking, especially when you have a dog in the race.

DESIST.
 
Magicpole said:
Believe nothing until you have actual, verifiable evidence. Putting forward a narrative, for any side, any conflict, where your biases see you accept as fact, because you agree, with other stupid cunts like you.

It's a red flag of a mind, devioud of the ability to employ critical thinking, especially when you have a dog in the race.

DESIST.
Click to expand...
I didn't mean you were a ****, I meant cunts who push a story they have no evidence for.theyre the cunts I was referring to. :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top