This is all so unnecessary. There is a perfectly good product - the flexi season ticket - that would be perfect for all those people who, for whatever reason, cannot attend a fair number of our matches. All it needed was the club to have marketed this properly without the £150 fine. By doing so, they've wrecked the reputation of their offerings to regular fans. Theyve started to make inroads into making it more attractive but have to regain the trust of the fans to do so and the fans need to let go some of the "all out to get us every time" approach to the club.
The club will swat away any legal challenge from the Tradeunion blues - they would easily persuade any court that it's part of their terms and conditions that the people they sell tickets at a block discounted rate do not then sell them on to other people and this is their way of protecting themselves. Its a bit embarrassing to be honest. We've all made the club realise that they need to be sensible with regards to stupid pricing of tickets and the lack of STs. There's now a pathway for new ST holders, there's a method where those that only can attend 10 matches can only pay for 10 matches and not 19 (a bit higher per match than full STs but less than single match tickets) and there's a sensible dialogue ongoing as to how the new North stand will work.
However, the club created this mistrust that the lady in the news article, some people on here, some of the 1894 and some of the Trade Union Blues seem to want to build on.
Its all so unnecessary...