The Labour Government

I think a lot of people (me included) have a problem with legal migration as well.

I am not opposed to it in principle. The issue I have is essentially pragmatic:

1. Irrespective of planning reforms, we do not have the bandwidth in terms of electricians, plumbers, plasters, roofers, bricklayers etc, to build the requisite numbers of houses. My brother-in-law is a builder and knows this all too well. Have you tried getting hold of a plumber lately? Anyone who is any good is booked up for weeks or months. We cannot continue bringing hundreds of thousands of additional people into the country every year as things stand. We can't house them, we don't have sufficient hospital or healthcare capacity or transport or anything else. The country is FULL.

2. Social integration. Surely we can all agree we want a well-integrated, socially harmonious society where sure, everyone has their own cultural heritage but we all rub along and respect what we have in common and also our differences. In far too many cases, we don't have that at the moment. We have right wing racist thugs hell bent on "taking our country back" and we have largely Muslim communities not integrating and declaring Islamic no-go areas for westerners. This cannot continue and with immigration running at current rates, it's only going to get worse until something terrible finally snaps. We could even end up in civil war unless we start to take this problem very seriously.
1. The last three or four times I’ve used a plumber or an electrician they’ve been immigrants so on a purely anecdotal point of view, more immigrants probably means more tradesmen not less.
2. Can you name an Islamic no-go area for Westerners in the UK? I’m not saying there aren’t valid concerns about integration but unless you can prove otherwise I’d say these mythical no-go areas are hyperbole.
 
Only they haven’t, Sunak has.

From your article, “The drop from 860,000 in the year to December 2024 follows a series of policies implemented by the last Conservative government that have been continued by the present Labour government.”

so what you moaning about legal migration for when its been halved in a year ?
 
so what you moaning about legal migration for when its been halved in a year ?
Because 400,000 is still WAY too many. That alone would result in less than zero additional homes for young British people. People who already cannot get on the housing ladder and/or are struggling with high rent payments. Even if Labour meet their 300k/y new home target, which is almost certain not going to be met.

We cannot sustain this.
 
Because 400,000 is still WAY too many. That alone would result in less than zero additional homes for young British people. People who already cannot get on the housing ladder and/or are struggling with high rent payments. Even if Labour meet their 300k/y new home target, which is almost certain not going to be met.

We cannot sustain this.

Tories had 14 years to curb migration, Labour have had 10 months - It's down from 800,000 to 400,000 - what did you realistically expect ? 800k to zero ?
 
My point is that we NEED these people here if our own are not prepared or able to carry out these roles. Full or not, and we are clearly not if you look around, unless there is a major shift in what the "locals" are prepared to do, future legal immigration is a necessity. You are the only person who suggested deportation.

Yes, there is a lot of drivel. I do, however try to keep mine factual. Remeber it's only a week since you were 50% out with one of your own "facts"! bye for now.
Interesting the debate has switched from Welfare to immigration because the two are intrinsically linked.
Full or not, and we are clearly not if you look around, unless there is a major shift in what the "locals" are prepared to do, future legal immigration is a necessity
The issue is just that " what the locals are prepared to do"
The "locals" choose not to do some jobs e.g. social care, agricultural work, because the provision of Welfare allows them that choice.

Look at what happened in Parliament yesterday - MP's debating cutting provision to some of the no doubt genuinely disabled in an attempt to reduce the Welfare bill, whilst maintaining a system that allows the able bodied to opt out of paid work and stay on benefits because low paid jobs "are not worth their while" - I don't blame them for making that choice by the way, perfectly understandable if that choice is available but it shouldn't be.
In history what kind of a society cannot even pick the vegetables from the ground or the fruit from the trees to feed itself, or be prepared to care for its own sick and elderly populace - surely we must be drunk on welfare for that to be able to happen.
If there was no welfare payout, would we find some care workers and agricultural workers ?

We haven't put that to the test because its easier for our cowardly politicians to import some cheap labour.
Low skilled Labour to do low paid jobs. Its only cheap because no one counts the cost of the social housing or housing benefit paid, the Universal credit, the healthcare costs, the education costs, the strain on infrastructure etc.
To top it all the tax take on those low paid jobs is minimal.

Low skilled immigration in this country now is economic lunacy .

To fix immigration we need to fix welfare .
Yesterday the debacle in Parliament and the latest from the channel demonstrated this government doesn't have the courage or the will to do either.
 
An honest political party would say something like:

1. This country is so fucked up with various issues that it will take us two or three terms to have a chance of turning it all around.

2. We can make no promises on taxation as we have no idea what circumstances may arise. We won't put up taxes for the fun of it (except for...) but will increase them if it is necessary.

3. You will need to be patient as we are not magicians. We also only have so many competent managers in the party, so mistakes will be made as people will have to learn on the job.

4. We will almost certainly drop bollocks and have to make U-turns.

Who would vote for that? No one. That's why politicians are dishonest. We voters insist on it.
 
Tories had 14 years to curb migration, Labour have had 10 months - It's down from 800,000 to 400,000 - what did you realistically expect ? 800k to zero ?
Well first of all thank-you for your admission that the 800k to 400k reduction was down to Tory policy changes and nothing Labour has done. Now, having got that out of the way, if we are to reduce it further, I’d like to see some policies which would drive that. I am unaware what they are. Are you aware of any?

What I do know is that your chum Starmer, has already agreed a deal with India that will let e.g. Accenture hire Indians in the UK and not pay employers’ NI, whilst requiring them to pay the NI if they hire British graduates or consultants. i.e. likely to increase migration. Also allowing their families to come and work under the same scheme, btw.

He’s working towards a youth mobility scheme to allow freedom of movement for youths aged up to 30 years of age (joke!)

He’s a fully paid up Remainer who believes strongly in freedom of movement and you would therefore have to question seriously whether has any actual desires or plans to reduce net migration at all.
 
Interesting the debate has switched from Welfare to immigration because the two are intrinsically linked.

The issue is just that " what the locals are prepared to do"
The "locals" choose not to do some jobs e.g. social care, agricultural work, because the provision of Welfare allows them that choice.

Look at what happened in Parliament yesterday - MP's debating cutting provision to some of the no doubt genuinely disabled in an attempt to reduce the Welfare bill, whilst maintaining a system that allows the able bodied to opt out of paid work and stay on benefits because low paid jobs "are not worth their while" - I don't blame them for making that choice by the way, perfectly understandable if that choice is available but it shouldn't be.
In history what kind of a society cannot even pick the vegetables from the ground or the fruit from the trees to feed itself, or be prepared to care for its own sick and elderly populace - surely we must be drunk on welfare for that to be able to happen.
If there was no welfare payout, would we find some care workers and agricultural workers ?

We haven't put that to the test because its easier for our cowardly politicians to import some cheap labour.
Low skilled Labour to do low paid jobs. Its only cheap because no one counts the cost of the social housing or housing benefit paid, the Universal credit, the healthcare costs, the education costs, the strain on infrastructure etc.
To top it all the tax take on those low paid jobs is minimal.

Low skilled immigration in this country now is economic lunacy .

To fix immigration we need to fix welfare .
Yesterday the debacle in Parliament and the latest from the channel demonstrated this government doesn't have the courage or the will to do either.
Spot on.

Successive governments (and yes, I blame the Tories) have used cheap foreign labour to give the illusion of economic growth whilst GDP per capita has been steadily falling.

Businesses have been allowed to bring in limitless numbers of unskilled workers, driving down wages and reducing incentives for investment in new technology to drive increased productivity. As a result we live in a low wage economy with some of the worst productivity in the western world. Shocking. It has to stop.

I don’t want to get into a “yes but the Tories had 14 years” bollocks argument. I accept it’s largely their fault… continuing what Blair started. But we are now in 2025 and we must make changes, whoever is in power. Leaving the EU - something I voted against and campaigned vehemently against - was in hindsight essential or else the door is wide open to people quite happy to do shitty jobs for bugger all money.
 
Last edited:
1. The last three or four times I’ve used a plumber or an electrician they’ve been immigrants so on a purely anecdotal point of view, more immigrants probably means more tradesmen not less.
2. Can you name an Islamic no-go area for Westerners in the UK? I’m not saying there aren’t valid concerns about integration but unless you can prove otherwise I’d say these mythical no-go areas are hyperbole.
Re 2, I did some Googling and it seems that may be an urban myth, so my apologies, but I had seen comments about such areas and had taken them on face value.

That said, there’s a world of difference between a no-go area on the one hand and harmonious integration on the other.
 
In history what kind of a society cannot even pick the vegetables from the ground or the fruit from the trees to feed itself, or be prepared to care for its own sick and elderly populace - surely we must be drunk on welfare for that to be able to happen.

I'm not going to comment on agriculture because I'm a know nowt but I can say with some confidence that we have
culturally become less capable of collectively caring for our vulnerable. Over decades we have eroded the value we place on certain types of behaviours and characteristics all of which are necessary to perform well in the caring professions. We have introduced systems and ways of working that do not reward those behaviours.

The UK has long been a hybrid country culturally: individualistic in some respects (but nowhere near as much as say the US), collectivist in others (but nowhere nears as some Asian countries), this dual personality has always created a tension but for a long time I think our relatively unique nature served us well imo. I think that balance has gone and it's no longer simply a question of 'training' British people to do those jobs, you don't 'teach' care and compassion in a workplace setting, you imbue it in people from an early age in the type of society you create both within and beyond your own four walls.
 
I'm not going to comment on agriculture because I'm a know nowt but I can say with some confidence that we have
culturally become less capable of collectively caring for our vulnerable. Over decades we have eroded the value we place on certain types of behaviours and characteristics all of which are necessary to perform well in the caring professions. We have introduced systems and ways of working that do not reward those behaviours.

The UK has long been a hybrid country culturally: individualistic in some respects (but nowhere near as much as say the US), collectivist in others (but nowhere nears as some Asian countries), this dual personality has always created a tension but for a long time I think our relatively unique nature served us well imo. I think that balance has gone and it's no longer simply a question of 'training' British people to do those jobs, you don't 'teach' care and compassion in a workplace setting, you imbue it in people from an early age in the type of society you create both within and beyond your own four walls.
I agree with all of that. But I also think we as a nation have become arrogant and up ourselves. Far too many people think, with respect to jobs, “I’m not doing THAT”. And of course pay is a big factor in that, and is intimately linked to how many people (too many) prefer to stay at home and not work. I wonder how many would change their tune if offered more money? Someone not working due to “my mental health” might not feel so inclined if they were going to be paid more.
 
Have people over there noticed any improvement in their everyday life in the last year? Serious question, not wumming.

I’ve had a good pay rise, I’m not affected by train strikes which was a weekly occurrence at one point, been able to book docs relatively quicker I’ve noticed this year. What massive changes to personal lives was people expecting?
 
Have people over there noticed any improvement in their everyday life in the last year? Serious question, not wumming.
Good question and Politics aside there has been no improvement IMO. I know we have inflation figures regularly issued but quite frankly I believe them to be questionable.

In fairness oil (petrol) prices seem to have stabilised even maybe fallen slightly... but everything, and I mean everything in the Supermarket seems to have risen remarkably. I can safely say that what I would have spent £80 on last year now costs around £95.... cans of beans, butter, bread, meats, biscuits (have shot up).

Personally I put a lot of that down to the increase in Employers increased NIC, no evidence of this except to say I am not expecting business profits to have fallen. Every link in the food chain will have endured increased costs. As an aside to this I think the prices were increasing before April when the Employers NIC increases kicked in.

I know many on here will reject and deny this, but this is my lived experience.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top