PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Interesting that some of the 115 Premier League charges are for breaching UEFA rules that were neither admitted or proven.

I wonder how Masters will justify not charging Villa and Chelsea (and the Rags before them) for admitted breaches of UEFA rules.
 
L
moomba said:
Interesting that some of the 115 Premier League charges are for breaching UEFA rules that were neither admitted or proven.

I wonder how Masters will justify not charging Villa and Chelsea (and the Rags before them) for admitted breaches of UEFA rules.
Click to expand...
Fingers in ears la la la la
 
moomba said:
Interesting that some of the 115 Premier League charges are for breaching UEFA rules that were neither admitted or proven.

I wonder how Masters will justify not charging Villa and Chelsea (and the Rags before them) for admitted breaches of UEFA rules.
Click to expand...

I imagine the UEFA-related allegations in the 115 case are not for breaching PSR but are for providing misleading financial information, much like the first tranche of allegations are for providing misleading financial information to the PL.
 
halfcenturyup said:
I imagine the UEFA-related allegations in the 115 case are not for breaching PSR but are for providing misleading financial information, much like the first tranche of allegations are for providing misleading financial information to the PL.
Click to expand...
That was my understanding, and that those allegations will automatically fail if they can't prove the initial ones
 
halfcenturyup said:
I imagine the UEFA-related allegations in the 115 case are not for breaching PSR but are for providing misleading financial information, much like the first tranche of allegations are for providing misleading financial information to the PL.
Click to expand...

Our charges (5 of them) are for "failure to comply with UEFAs regulations including Financial Fair Play Regulations".

Unless the rule has been changed or removed that would seem to catch-all (that the premier league want to catch).
 
halfcenturyup said:
I imagine the UEFA-related allegations in the 115 case are not for breaching PSR but are for providing misleading financial information, much like the first tranche of allegations are for providing misleading financial information to the PL.
Click to expand...
UEFA have not accepted Chelsea's hotel and women's team scam...

"Clubs were required to perform adjustments, as profits from such transactions cannot be recognised as relevant income according to the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Sustainability Regulations – Edition 2024 (“Regulations”)."

That will put pressure on the Premier League. I think they are still reviewing some of what Chelsea have done.
 
Marvin. said:
UEFA have not accepted Chelsea's hotel and women's team scam...

"Clubs were required to perform adjustments, as profits from such transactions cannot be recognised as relevant income according to the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Sustainability Regulations – Edition 2024 (“Regulations”)."

That will put pressure on the Premier League. I think they are still reviewing some of what Chelsea have done.
Click to expand...
I doubt it. The adjustments required by UEFA have been allowed by the PL
 
Colin Bells Boots said:
Whilst not being part of the tribunal hearing , obviously, I was choosing to try and keep things sem-professional.

Had our KC's been permitted to use the BM vernacular , they would have probably referred to the " practices of Richard Masters and other PL members, acting at the behest of the cabal members and fellow UK owned clubs, as a conspiracy and prejudiciary act of blatant corruption and abuse of power.

Simplified perhaps using the word cunts for the sake of brevity . Hope that helps ?
Click to expand...
No. How were you using the word issue, for a topic of conversation or a personal problem
eg I have an issue with that. This word ISSUE became popular with IT workers because they couldn't been seen having problems.
 
Nothing on the Beeb or Sly Sports, 2 clubs guilty of breaking the rules, both admitted guilt and paid the fines. Where are the yellow banners on the bottom of the screen? Why is my phone not buzzing with breaking news? Not charged, guilty of breaches. No media outcry? No witch hunt? Wonder why? Nothing to see here Masters? No concerns?
 
WARBABY said:
No. How were you using the word issue, for a topic of conversation or a personal problem
eg I have an issue with that. This word ISSUE became popular with IT workers because they couldn't been seen having problems.
Click to expand...

Take a day off ffs and get with the programme !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top