Football Governance Bill (Independent Regulator)

I'm With Stupid said:
I mean the fucking irony, but yeah. Isn't it funny how these important positions just happen to go to someone who donated a large amount of money to the people who happen to be in charge at the time?
Click to expand...

Isn't it just mate, doesn't matter what political divide it is it always seems the same.
 
Tbilisi said:
Good words from Nandy but lets see.

Sheff Wed and Morecambe situ is dreadful, lets hope it improves things.

Oh for a German 51 here, fook the money.
Click to expand...
1. The test of whether the smaller clubs are protected will be the regulation of debt, which is what gets them into trouble.
2. The German 51 is a bit of a myth:
a) Some clubs are exempt from the rule.
b) The biggest clubs find a way round it. Bayern, for example, is 51% owned by a large sports conglomerate ‘club’ which in theory belongs to its members.
But its three main sponsors own 25% of the club between them and sit on its board. In practice Bayern is controlled by commercial interests, not by its 51% fan base.
 
TheGhost said:
It’s going to be light touch so only really get involved where it feels that the football governing bodies either need a hand or guidance.
Click to expand...
Given that City are suing the pants off the PL for activating illegal and unfair regulations, I think that football body is in desperate need of guidance.
The guidance should be: ‘Change your ridiculous rules or we’ll do it for you. Administer your rules fairly and equally for all clubs.’
 
mexico1970 said:
If the regulator can't do much what was the point in setting it up?
Click to expand...
You are confusing one poster’s view of what the regulator is going to do with the actual powers they have.
Their first objective of ensuring financial sustainability is the gateway to huge powers they have to bring this about. Similarly, every club will have to apply for a licence from the regulator; huge power there.
I accept that this sort of idea is regularly fucked up by bad government but let’s not be too pessimistic….they may even do some good. I’m going to give it a chance.
 
KS55 said:
You are confusing one poster’s view of what the regulator is going to do with the actual powers they have.
Their first objective of ensuring financial sustainability is the gateway to huge powers they have to bring this about. Similarly, every club will have to apply for a licence from the regulator; huge power there.
I accept that this sort of idea is regularly fucked up by bad government but let’s not be too pessimistic….they may even do some good. I’m going to give it a chance.
Click to expand...

Surely it’s easier to be edgy any cynical and write the whole thing off before it’s even been set up? Despite the fact that the Tories initiated this bill with cross party support, tried to get it through parliament before they were booted out, and Labour picked up again immediately when they were in power. The only real criticism has been from Kemi Khazi who knows nothing about the game and tried some woeful political point scoring which never landed.
 
KS55 said:
1. The test of whether the smaller clubs are protected will be the regulation of debt, which is what gets them into trouble.
2. The German 51 is a bit of a myth:
a) Some clubs are exempt from the rule.
b) The biggest clubs find a way round it. Bayern, for example, is 51% owned by a large sports conglomerate ‘club’ which in theory belongs to its members.
But its three main sponsors own 25% of the club between them and sit on its board. In practice Bayern is controlled by commercial interests, not by its 51% fan base.
Click to expand...
Yes, appreciate Wolfsburg, Leverkusen etc was more commenting on the concept.

Although it is maybe a myth to some extent (not looked into Bayern, didnt know that) no one could say German fans dont have more power in clubs than PL fans overall.
 
KS55 said:
In about 1981 I gave £5 to the ANC, but they appointed someone else as S.A. Minister of Sport. You can’t trust anybody these days.
Click to expand...

The ANC were considered a terrorist organisation in 1981 by SA, USA & UK, only in the 90s did attitudes change.

I’m sure you’d have made a fantastic MOS but would you have supported sporting sanctions?
 
KS55 said:
You are confusing one poster’s view of what the regulator is going to do with the actual powers they have.
Their first objective of ensuring financial sustainability is the gateway to huge powers they have to bring this about. Similarly, every club will have to apply for a licence from the regulator; huge power there.
I accept that this sort of idea is regularly fucked up by bad government but let’s not be too pessimistic….they may even do some good. I’m going to give it a chance.
Click to expand...

If we give up & never try then there’s no chance but I think the poster is right to pessimistic. So often something starts with the right intentions suddenly gets taken in a different direction.
 
cheekybids said:
The ANC were considered a terrorist organisation in 1981 by SA, USA & UK, only in the 90s did attitudes change.

I’m sure you’d have made a fantastic MOS but would you have supported sporting sanctions?
Click to expand...
I supported UK sanctions vs S.A. In SA itself there was a lot of support for sanctions from the black pop because they could see the effect it was having. Black players were, of course, excluded from cricket and rugby, the main africaaner sports. Black men did, however, organise their own football games.
Bafana bafana emerged from there.
 
KS55 said:
I supported UK sanctions vs S.A. In SA itself there was a lot of support for sanctions from the black pop because they could see the effect it was having. Black players were, of course, excluded from cricket and rugby, the main africaaner sports. Black men did, however, organise their own football games.
Bafana bafana emerged from there.
Click to expand...

As much as we say keep politics out of sport I think this showed the positive effects of sanctions.
 
Longridge Blue said:
I think football is fucking its self up. All down to greed by owners, broadcasters etc.
Click to expand...
If only the original sky 4 wasn't so fuckin greedy and wanted it all for themselves, maybe we wouldn't find ourselves in this shit sandwich we call football.
No doubt masters and the yank owners are trying to rewrite and change the rules and regulations as we speak.
 
KS55 said:
You are confusing one poster’s view of what the regulator is going to do with the actual powers they have.
Their first objective of ensuring financial sustainability is the gateway to huge powers they have to bring this about. Similarly, every club will have to apply for a licence from the regulator; huge power there.
I accept that this sort of idea is regularly fucked up by bad government but let’s not be too pessimistic….they may even do some good. I’m going to give it a chance.
Click to expand...


That's really the point I was making mate, this is a gateway for further shenanigans. I mean why would someone want the job of being regulator so much if it wasn't to make money for themselves and more importantly their "Friends".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top