Think we'll just have to disagree on this one. I think it doesn't need mentioning unless a club is concerned and selling for those reasons.
Goes to show how people can read something differently - this one I dont think is a major thing either way, but it can happen on bigger things too.
Fair enough.
I believe it was highlighting a large (£25M) cash injection, which is all profit under the rules and is a big number, even today, for an Academy product.
I think everyone in football now understands that City are running a “football finishing school” for the 16-22 crowd who want to be professionals (preferably at City, of course). However, our Academy, while obviously hoping for that £100M breakthrough first team talent, is actually a better than self-sustaining profit center for the club, while also giving the players a football and life education.
It is something of which Mansour & Khaldoon should be rightfully proud, and is now a feather in the cap of the club.
Let’s not forget that for every player, or group of players, that generate £25M in profit each year, they are literally buying 2 to 3 first team squad players who cost the club £125M on 5 year contracts!
Indeed, a £25M McAtee transfer fee and the money from the CWC this summer will about cover the amortization of all the Jan & June new signings for the year! That means the operations of the club will “only” have to cover their wages, and most of them are nowhere near top tier wages. Heck, Grealish’s wad will probably cover 3 or 4 of them!!
With one year on McAtee’s contract, him clearly not signing another one, and having had a decent year at City and an outstanding year with England, it’s the perfect time to literally “profit” from his sale.