Haha, from Dippers fans in germany there was following question, which I want so share with you. But the whole money we invest is dirty oil. Sick of this shit:
Doesn't Liverpool also have an US investor? Or is he keeping completely quiet when it comes to investments?
He usually keeps quiet when it comes to investments. On the contrary. In the past, he liked to take a decent slice of the pie and block (large) investments, so you had to get creative and work with what you were given. This year, it seems that they are investing what they have earned in recent years, or they will sit tight again in the next transfer periods. It should also not be forgotten that all transfers are still quite young and will have a similar or even higher resale value.
We're not buying players in their late 20s for $100 million, but players in their early 20s. These are both sporting and financial investments whose value and development are highly unlikely to have reached their peak yet.
That's right, Fenway Sports Group (FSG) is technically the investor, but they don't just give the club money for transfers. As far as I know, they occasionally provide interest-free loans, such as for the expansion of the Main Stand at Anfield Road, but that's money that has to be paid back. Of course, this is also a kind of advantage over clubs without investors, but far less so than in direct comparison to City Group, Todd Boehly, or the Qataris of Paris. That's why FSG has been heavily criticized by fans for years, although things have understandably calmed down a lot since last season's title win.
Thank you, one of the few who understands the background and does not make wild accusations such as investors pumping endless amounts of money into the club.
To put this into context, I recently came across the following figures:
Last season, they were 20th in terms of net spending.
Over the last three seasons, they were 7th (FFP relevant).
Since the 2019–20 season, they have been 10th in the EPL.
They have spent so much less money than they could have.
In today's article in the New York Times, CEO Billy Hogan talks about:
Record revenues with the best turnover in history,
“commercial revenue” greater than that of ManUnited in the EPL era for the first time,
plus the first season with increased revenues from the Anfield Road Stand expansion,
five concerts in the summer,
a new equipment deal (it was mentioned elsewhere that it is a fixed £60 million, but with increased variable shares, it is expected to be £80-90 million per year)
Premier League and ECL prize and TV money of £255 million = €293 million
So they have the money and are not getting it as a gift from investors.
But it should also be clear that the upcoming transfer windows are likely to look rather meager.
But no one cares about that anymore. NOW is the time for outrage.