President Trump

1. Lots of Maga folks make this claim. And as a lawyer she should know better. But I think there is a fair claim that she was simply loose with her words. If you watched the interview the guy asks something like
Qst: So when are we going to get the Epstein's list?
Ans: Its on my desk for review right now, and the JFK files, and the So and so file. All on my desk. So very soon.

Its understandable, that the questioner and listeners assumed she was talking about the Epstein list. As that was the question she was asked. But its quite possible her response was referring to the Epstein file as amongst all the other files she claimed was on her desk for review.

Frankly, its possible she presumed before reviewing the file that there would be an Epstein list in there. Only to review and find there wasn't.

Her response can legitimately be read either way.



No it wasn't. But she never actually said Epstein list. The interviewer did. She simply responded that it was on her desk awaiting review. And in the same sentence she included other files that were awaiting review.

She'll get no reprieve but i can genuinely see her point of view.



You are assuming my saying there are no Epstein list suggests it doesn't exist. No. Its possible it exists but she actually doesn't have it. And now she's stick in a catch 22.
Do you not get embarrassed deliberately soiling yourself in public with a ludicrous defence of someone who wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire?
 
So now he's claiming the files show Clinton went to the island 28 times

But the files don't exist

Yet they were written by Obama

Sounds legit
See, even Pudge has made the same mistake. Interchanging file with list. There is an Epstein file. The claim is that there is no list of powerful people that Epstein kept as a 'get out of jail' blackmail card.
But Pudge isn't a lawyer ( i presume) and certainly not an AG who should be far more careful and specific.

On the other hand, that Clinton went 28 times is neither here nor there by the way. It may be suggestive, but it isn't proof of actual foul play.
 
Last edited:
Do you not get embarrassed deliberately soiling yourself in public with a ludicrous defence of someone who wouldn’t piss on you if you were on fire?
Nope. I do get a kick out of people recognizing the possibility that they were wrong, and immediately resort to insults...


Emotional regulation is not a strong point for some here. I musr have missed this place


Naaaaaaaah... :)
 
Nope. I do get a kick out of people recognizing the possibility that they were wrong, and immediately resort to insults...


Emotional regulation is not a strong point for some here. I musr have missed this place


Naaaaaaaah... :)
Another series of lies. Of course you’re embarrassed. It’s why you disappear for weeks at a time.

Calling you deceitful isn’t an insult. It’s a factual description of you based on your posts. Saying you disappear because “you’re bored” is a lie.

No one here can believe that — faced with all the evidence — any rational person with a reasonably-developed moral center could support this man. Damn straight we’re emotional. In contrast, I don’t recall that you’ve once demonstrated that the suffering of others matters to you — except the suffering of people on the other side of what you believe.
 
Last edited:
Nope. I do get a kick out of people recognizing the possibility that they were wrong, and immediately resort to insults...


Emotional regulation is not a strong point for some here. I musr have missed this place


Naaaaaaaah... :)

Understandable in many ways. Our two countries are in conflict with each other in the form of a trade war, coupled with threats and coercion towards ourselves and others. There is also a natural affinity and sympathy towards Canada who are bearing the brunt of your country’s hostility and aggression. Our Head of State is also Canada’s Head of State which makes a State visit to the UK by Trump objectionable in my eyes.

For many of us here, and in Canada and Australia (I have family in both countries) the US is not welcome and the legacy of current US behaviour will be long lasting.

So, yes, emotions can run high, and is a natural patriotic response to our country, and other Commonwealth countries, being attacked. If you are a US citizen and openly supportive of this attack on the UK, I would suggest minding your manners. Taking a shit on the lounge carpet when you are visiting someone else’s house in the middle of a dispute you started is not recommended.
 
Why do I feel that I need to take a knee on this. If Israel are committing genocide, or ethnic cleansing, surely they couldn’t do this if the hostages are released as they’d have to stop what they’re doing?

It is not about the hostages - hasn't been since after about week 2 the Zionist response. Its a land grab
 
Nope. I do get a kick out of people recognizing the possibility that they were wrong, and immediately resort to insults...


Emotional regulation is not a strong point for some here. I musr have missed this place


Naaaaaaaah... :)
Asking a question based on demonstrable facts doesn’t equate to resorting to insults.

If I wanted to insult you I would just call you a **** like your tangerine hero and few would argue that you don’t deserve it.
 
Asking a question based on demonstrable facts doesn’t equate to resorting to insults.

If I wanted to insult you I would just call you a **** like your tangerine hero and few would argue that you don’t deserve it.
In fairness, the claim about resorting to insult wasn't about your post. It was about the prior post. I just responded to you since you asked a question and the other guy simply wanted to insult.
 
Another series of lies. Of course you’re embarrassed. It’s why you disappear for weeks at a time.

Calling you deceitful isn’t an insult. It’s a factual description of you based on your posts. Saying you disappear because “you’re bored” is a lie.

No one here can believe that — faced with all the evidence — any rational person with a reasonably-developed moral center could support this man. Damn straight we’re emotional. In contrast, I don’t recall that you’ve once demonstrated that the suffering of others matters to you — except the suffering of people on the other side of what you believe.

In short, you’re the bad guy, mate. Which I am sure bothers you not a whit.
Yikes! Tiring. Relentlessly tiring drivel. "You are the bad guy" "You are lying" " you are not bored." "Your morals" Bla bla bla...

The sad part is you think "your belief" is required. Believe whatever makes you feel good.

This is why i get bored. There is no discussion of the facts. Just constant emotional drivel.

Challenge the claims made. Show contrary evidence. No. None of that. Just ine personal attack after another pretending to be sn argument.


It, you, yhis thread is boring!!!! Trump is the stupidest. He is the meannest. He is the greediest. Rewind. Repeat.


He confiscated 22 million fentanyl pill? Is this good or bad. Is it effective. Is it attacking a problem? No, y'all would rather discuss the fact that someone claimed it saved a million lives.

You are just a boring groupthink.
.
 
Last edited:
Yikes! Tiring. Relentlessly tiring drivel. "You are the bad guy" "You are lying" " you are not bored." "Your morals" Bla bla bla...

The sad part is you think "your belief" is required. Believe whatever makes you feel good.

This is why i get bored. There is no discussion of the facts. Just constant emotional drivel.

Challenge the claims made. Show contrary evidence. No. None of that. Just ine personal attack after another pretending to be sn argument.


It, you, yhis thread is boring!!!! Trump is the stupidest. He is the meannest. He is the greediest. Rewind. Repeat.


He confiscated 22 million fentanyl pill? Is this good or bad. Is it effective. Is it attacking a problem? No, y'all would rather discuss the fact that someone claimed it saved a million lives.

You are just a boring groupthink.
.

You’re being emotional.
 
Possible to go lower? Is this lower than claiming it's all a Democrat hoax like Trump, or like Trump wishing her well? Or is this just another way of saying "hoax" or "rigged"?


Newsmax host Greg Kelly said on his show that Ghislaine Maxwell might be a victim and that there was a rush to judgment.

At least 40 women have credibly accused Ghislaine Maxwell of either directly abusing them, grooming them, or facilitating their sexual exploitation on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.

Some of them have detailed these allegations on camera.

Kelly suggests that only the media and prosecutors are the source of these allegations — again, 40 women have credibly accused Ghislaine Maxwell of various forms of sexual misconduct, including sexual violence.

This is not some creation of the media and prosecutors.

In fact, it was some in the media and in law enforcement who shielded Epstein for much too long.

I was reading back over the testimony at Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial last night. This was Carolyn, who died in 2023, talking about being 14 and Maxwell questioning her about being raped as a child, groping her, and saying she “had a great body for Mr. Epstein and his friends”

Friends? I thought Trump said this was a hoax?
 
Last edited:
Oh no! I really hope Bill Clinton isn't in the Epstein files.
I'll have to get rid of my Bill Clinton hat and my Bill Clinton
sneakers and my Bill Clinton cologne and my Bill Clinton watch
and take down my Bill Clinton flag, and I'll have to delete my
Bill Clinton NFT trading cards.

What will I do with my Bill Clinton bible?

"Epstein and Trump were actually assaulted by those 14 year old girls! Trump's going to sue them! Let justice be done."
Newsmax next week.
 
says the quiet bit loud



I read that and immediately thought he was talking about the Israelis. No hostages reduces the justification for what they are doing. Genocide or ethnic cleansing or whatever you want to call it.

At the very least it's projection onto Hamas, imho.

Wrong thread, though.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top