Tino Livramento

Trafford makes no difference to anything he's club trained. HG we have the maximum 4, NHG we are well over the 17.
I'm missing at least one player I think but we've got Foden, Bobb & Trafford (if signed) as 3 of the 4 CT spots for UEFA purposes with Lewis & O'Reilly capable of going on the 'B' list as they're still only 20. Ake & Stones (if both stay) would be 2 of the 4 AT spots, McAtee is gone regardless.

Who am I missing?
 
Last edited:
I'm missing at least one player I think but we've got Foden, Bobb & Trafford (if signed) as 3 of the 4 CT spots for UEFA purposes with Lewis & O'Reilly capable of going on the 'B' list as they're still only 20. Ake & Stones (if both stay) would be 2 of he 4 AT spots, McAtee is gone regardless.

Who am I missing?
Bettinelli and Grealish if he stays.
 
I'm missing at least one player I think but we've got Foden, Bobb & Trafford (if signed) as 3 of the 4 CT spots for UEFA purposes with Lewis & O'Reilly capable of going on the 'B' list as they're still only 20. Ake & Stones (if both stay) would be 2 of he 4 AT spots, McAtee is gone regardless.

Who am I missing?
Grealish and Bettinelli.
 
West Ham fans voted him their best player last season, and his defensive game has always been well regarded. Criticism was made of his attacking game at Utd but I think that has improved.

With City returning to training on Monday, the lack of links to other right backs suggests that we won't be bringing in a right back.
Especially him
 
West Ham fans voted him their best player last season, and his defensive game has always been well regarded. Criticism was made of his attacking game at Utd but I think that has improved.

With City returning to training on Monday, the lack of links to other right backs suggests that we won't be bringing in a right back.
Doesn’t suggest anything how many links to a left back before we signed Ait Nouri ?
 
The world knows we want a right back and agents will be doing everything they possibly can to fill the vacancy. Doesn't mean it will get filled mind
 
Given the choice, if Newcastle need money because of their PSR situation, I'm guessing they would rather sacrifice Livramento than Isak.
They would but selling Isak isn’t their choosing, and isn’t a PSR thing,the player is trying to force it.
 
Must be me but i dont see what all rhe fuss is with Livramento.Never seen him have a good game.

Same, but I've never seen him have a poor game either. If he's who we want then I hope we get him and hope he continues improving - i feel he's a little one-dimensional right now, but give it a year or two...
 
So if we get this over the line we won’t just be strengthening ourselves, we could be depriving Liverpool of a world class striker too.

Sounds good to me.
I don’t think so, us getting Livramento isn’t going to change Isaks mind. Isak either goes or doesn’t.
 
I don't think Newcastle are at any risk with psr
Said the same thing a couple of times now. Don't know why there's this narrative that they are when there's no indication that is the case.

they didnt spend all that much over the last 2 windows and the window thats just been factored out of calculations as of this month is the window where they spent heavily. They're fine.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top