RobinHood
Well-Known Member
And I wouldn't piss on him!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,209
- Team supported
- Manchester City
If this guy mumbles from questions on a TV interview then a top KC from our legal team would surely run rings around him ?
Be more interested in hearing about a senior police officer interviewing the **** on conspiracy / corruption charges personally.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,870
I find it even harder to believe that he and the Premier League aren't asking for definitive timescales, such are the legal costs being incurred on a daily basis!!
It makes you laugh that he’s using the excuse of sheer amount of charges as reason for a delay. That should have been enough to show this whole shit show hadn’t been considered beyond charging & leaking.
give it to gordon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Nov 2013
- Messages
- 20,393
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Masters just been on Bloomberg TV.............I'm no expert on body language but his rebuff from questions related to City and 115 was not very impressive.
What a fucking load of bollocks he speaks.
The financial rules are to protect the American cartel its that simple. He just spoke a load of bollocks.
Rags 1.5 billion in debt yet they dont break the pl rules whilst breaking the Uefa rules.
Colin Bells Boots
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 19,209
- Team supported
- Manchester City
With the amount of people that turned the job down the stupid twat was daft enough to be the sacrificial lamb
The money on offer was presumably the deciding factor seeing as his levels of honesty, credibility and/or integrity are clearly non-existent.
Tracking back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Mar 2019
- Messages
- 2,367
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yes.With the amount of people that turned the job down the stupid twat was daft enough to be the sacrificial lamb
There were a few candidates before him that had the integrity to turn the job down.
You would think that if the rags and dippers were the two clubs vetting you for the position then you'd run a mile.
Or at least lube up real good before signing on the dotted line.
Tracking back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Mar 2019
- Messages
- 2,367
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yes,It makes you laugh that he’s using the excuse of sheer amount of charges as reason for a delay. That should have been enough to show this whole shit show hadn’t been considered beyond charging & leaking.
I noticed that.
When the presenter asked him why the Everton decision was dealt with so quickly are we still waiting for a decision on MCFC.
Master's stopped just short of saying "well it's the amount of charges"
which is the underpinning factor in this whole case: "chuck enough mud and some will stick"
At least they hope it will.
Tracking back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Mar 2019
- Messages
- 2,367
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Yes,It makes you laugh that he’s using the excuse of sheer amount of charges as reason for a delay. That should have been enough to show this whole shit show hadn’t been considered beyond charging & leaking.
I noticed that.
When the presenter asked him why the Everton decision was dealt with so quickly are we still waiting for a decision on MCFC.
Master's stopped just short of saying "well it's the amount of charges"
which is the underpinning factor in this whole case: "chuck enough mud and some will stick"
At least they hope it will.
He even got that wrong.Yes,
I noticed that.
When the presenter asked him why the Everton decision was dealt with so quickly are we still waiting for a decision on MCFC.
Master's stopped just short of saying "well it's the amount of charges"
which is the underpinning factor in this whole case: "chuck enough mud and some will stick"
At least they hope it will.
Everton were charged under rules that were changed to ensure expedited hearings. We weren't.
They admitted guilt. We didn't.
We were charged with totally different offences.
I think he pointed out one of those.
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
Masters just been on Bloomberg TV.............I'm no expert on body language but his rebuff from questions related to City and 115 was not very impressive.
This just proves how thick he is
Everton admitted they had broken financial rules and their punishment was all about the mitigating circumstances
Whereas City have admitted to nothing and there have been millions of documents submitted to the tribunal which all have to be considered
Masters just been on Bloomberg TV.............I'm no expert on body language but his rebuff from questions related to City and 115 was not very impressive.
He doesn’t look or sound very confident! Let’s hope that’s the case!
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,870
He doesn’t look or sound very confident! Let’s hope that’s the case!
I think if he was he’d have thrown a bit of innuendo in there.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,870
Another thing about the Masters clip was it started about him having served 20 years making it about him. I think it’s about his brand management. He’s on a PR walk.
Imagine not saying one of your clubs was crowned world champions whilst discussing the tournament.
Imagine not saying one of your clubs was crowned world champions whilst discussing the tournament.
Centurions
Well-Known Member
He was made to look a laughing stock when called for the government inquiry or whatever the hell it was.If this guy mumbles from questions on a TV interview then a top KC from our legal team would surely run rings around him ?
True, he suggested that the Everton verdict was quicker because Masters had a vested interest in helping City by delaying the verdict. Masters rambling response about more charges is untrue, the simple fact of why Everton were dealt with quicker is because they accepted the charges and so unlike us did not go through a lengthy arbitration process.Felt the interviewer hates City more than Masters did.
Mcfc1.9.8.0
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2023
- Messages
- 1,701
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Especially when he knows the question. No right minded person goes into an interview on tv without knowing the questionsIf this guy mumbles from questions on a TV interview then a top KC from our legal team would surely run rings around him ?
The Scarlet Pimpernel
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2011
- Messages
- 893
Hope you’re wrong as I’d love to see him do what I know he’s capable of on the international stageI don't think Foden will ever get a decent chance again for England while Bellingham's ego fill up half the pitch
bigA
Well-Known Member
I'd get petrol pump instead.And I wouldn't piss on him!
The hidden process relating to the 115 charges is totally ridiculous. It is not beyond the whit of man for all parties to agree to the release of an indicative timeline. The KCs must know now when their decision is likely to be available. Even if they have a range. E.g. October/November or similar. I think the PL need to build some more transparency into their processes. The 115 process completely ignores the fans and the public interest in this type of case. Surely some framework timeliness could be shared. Shambolic stuff.
Are we sure he decided not to as oppose to us telling him he wasn't welcome?He didnt even turn up for our last title win.....says it all
If it was the latter I would be delighted.