richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,758
Now that would be a great deal. They aren’t letting porro though are theyGet Porro in a deal.
Now that would be a great deal. They aren’t letting porro though are they
Get Porro in a deal.
Bit far fetched. Did he even play a game for us or even walk through the door at the CFA?Probably not but we should at least try and sort the RB situation out at the same time if possible and Porro at least knows the club.
Nice of him to tell you.Grealish will not want to go all the way down to London just because his family don’t want to move! It’s Everton or he stays
LolNice of him to tell you.
I know you say you sre not comparing them and that's fine. But David Silva had 194 GA in 436 games for City. Jack had 24 in 95 games.
One has a 44% production rate the other is at 25%. They are not in the same stratosphere. Silva is a great both in reality and on paper. Jack is not.
It seems in the end Jack's highest level was what he had at Villa. He simply couldn't step up once the level went up.
We paid like we were getting a phenom who was a potential superstar in a smaller pond, but his performance suggests he was simply a very good player in a smaller pond who became a role player in a bigger bond.
No biggie. It happens. We keep stepping
.
Hes miles better than nunesHe ain’t better than Nunes porro makes as many Bozo moments as him!
I think his ability to keep the ball played a role. The assumption was that he'd fit in seamlessly in a tili taka tight area team and eventually his production will spike in the midst of better players.This is the bit I struggle with.
His PL record at Villa was P 96 GS 15.
In the Championship it was P 89 GS 14.
In the PL at City he’s P 61 GS 8.
Now, considering he almost always played 90 minutes for Villa and rarely played 90 minutes for City, his record isn’t any different, so I’m still not sure what people were expecting of him.
You asked if he had answered the guy who mentioned Silva. I assumed that meant you agreed the guy who mentioned Silva had a point about how the stats didn't show value.I didn't mention Silva..
Goals and Assists. We bought Grealish, and any other attacking player to keep our goals and goal creation churning. I thought.Still blows my mind that people are seemingly annoyed at Grealish's output like he was on 30g+a at Villa when we signed him.
Right or wrong, we wasn't buying him because we needed goals.
You aaked if he had answered the guy who mentioned Silva. I assumed that meant you agreed the guy who mentioned Silva has a point about how the stats didn't show value.
Goals why’s yep defending wise about the sameHes miles better than nunes
If he was any good we wouldn't have let him go.Hes miles better than nunes
Yeah Palmer was shite tooIf he was any good we wouldn't have let him go.
whatGoals why’s yep defending wise about the same
My mate at work is a Spurs fan, we was literally talking about Porro yesterday, he can't stand him. He was saying he consistently gives the ball away.He ain’t better than Nunes porro makes as many Bozo moments as him!