Maybe they know we won't sell to a rival? We're happy to sell to the team who came 17th but I doubt we'd sell a young, promising player to Arsenal or Liverpool.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Savinho | City reject Spurs approach
- Thread starter bluesmith
- Start date
Especially as they have already put a big bid in? shocked we seemingly rejected 70m euros to be honest!
Tottenham ITK who’s very good for them saying Levy believes that City don’t want to let Savinho go until after we play them. The money is there for Savinho
Thats why they are getting Eze done first.
I think Eze is too similar too Cherki, Foden, Marmoush and most likely in the future Bobb. All Players who‘s full potential comes through the middle of the pitch. A real winger would make more sense.Sell Savinho to Spurs then buy Eze. They’d be gutted. I think Eze would be a better fit, but Rodrygo makes a huge statement.
I mean Barcelona doesn’t have money anyways. Madrid was interested in him a year ago and most likely don’t wanna pay 70M same with Chelsea. Liverpool is a No-Brainer for obvious reasons.It’s clearly an open secret that we are willing to let Savinho go for the right amount of money. What is interesting though is that despite this, and some people claiming that Savinho is this great player, only Spurs are interested. Not Real Madrid, not Barcelona, not Liverpool, not Chelsea, not Arsenal, not PSG, etc. If he was going to be such a big loss you’d expect those at the top table to be linked with him but none of them are…
Happy if that’s the case…but can we keep spurs guessing until the end of the window?
I hope so. They need Eze more though due to kulusevski and Maddison being out. Might all be an attempt for Levy to please the spurs fan just to pay in the end. They also want Hincapie - I personally don’t see Spurs paying 210M for 3 players now.
Rammy Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 May 2008
- Messages
- 32,000
Not a prayer we turned a bid of that level down, it never happened.Especially as they have already put a big bid in? shocked we seemingly rejected 70m euros to be honest!
richards30
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2009
- Messages
- 31,731
Not a prayer we turned a bid of that level down, it never happened.
Romano posted that though didnt he and he`s a Mendes and Viana guy?
Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
Makes sense really. Why let him debut against us - would be beyond stupid unless deadline day is this Friday. Which it isn't. Loads of time left . . .Tottenham ITK who’s very good for them saying Levy believes that City don’t want to let Savinho go until after we play them. The money is there for Savinho
Thats why they are getting Eze done first.
IrishBloodEnglishHeart
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jun 2022
- Messages
- 2,222
- Team supported
- City
Smash these next weekend and sing "Sav Sav what's the score?!"
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
This is an ITK stating the bloody obvious to up their credibility as an ITKTottenham ITK who’s very good for them saying Levy believes that City don’t want to let Savinho go until after we play them. The money is there for Savinho
Thats why they are getting Eze done first.
Ghostofmerlin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Aug 2020
- Messages
- 1,623
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Seems as if this would be an easily negotiated situation.Tottenham ITK who’s very good for them saying Levy believes that City don’t want to let Savinho go until after we play them. The money is there for Savinho
Thats why they are getting Eze done first.
paul power
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 110
Don’t believe that. We could make the deal this week, and part of the deal would be that he should not Play on saturday.Tottenham ITK who’s very good for them saying Levy believes that City don’t want to let Savinho go until after we play them. The money is there for Savinho
Thats why they are getting Eze done first.
Yes, sell a player completely but dictate when they can and can't play. Spurs would be happy with that.Don’t believe that. We could make the deal this week, and part of the deal would be that he should not Play on saturday.
Of course they would.Yes, sell a player completely but dictate when they can and can't play. Spurs would be happy with that.
Dont need to if its completely late Friday he wont be registered to play Saturday will he we dont need to reach agreement with them over not playing himDon’t believe that. We could make the deal this week, and part of the deal would be that he should not Play on saturday.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Happens all the timeYes, sell a player completely but dictate when they can and can't play. Spurs would be happy with that.
Rodri’s ACL
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2025
- Messages
- 1,770
- Team supported
- Manchester City
I’d take with a pinch of salt as he trained at home recently while the squad were at matches/training.
Last edited:
Lee the Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 May 2009
- Messages
- 980
Balague is quite plugged in with Pep so Id say thats pretty definitive.
Good! Rather ugly than happy flowers.I think if we reject Tottenham next bid it could get ugly. I still maintain I think Savinho pushes this not an Isak situation but similar.
Blue Smarties
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 27,280
Not a fan of this decision. He wanted out, fuck him - can the ****.