Bigga
Well-Known Member
With you fully on the Stones thing, his calming influence rubs off on dias who doesnt need to run around acting as a carer for his cb partner when he is with Stones.
I've got a slightly different take on the captaincy thing though. Certain players just don't need that responsibility. I never believed kdb should have been captain and walker certainly shouldn't have got it, Stones for me is another in the same bracket who you just want to leave to be excellent without the extra responsibility.
Dias does seem to thrive on being a visible and vocal leader and that kind of leadership does get certain players up for it so I've no issue with him being captain.
it's ultimately a trivial thing though as all senior players will contribute and act like captains in their own ways.
Well, I agree totally with @johnny crossan.
In footy, you get doers and talkers. Dias does a LOT of talking, Stones just does it. Bails him out all the time and calms him. If you're busy doing the talking and not a master in your own position, that's not captain material for me. Being a loud cheerleader doesn't mean anything. There's a pride behind leading a talented team at City, that's why it matters to be the captain, in my eyes.
The difference with the examples you gave is that De Bruyne should have been the Capt except injury robbed him of the armband, so Walker (the original deputy took it). De Bruyne drove his team mates by example as did the other worthy holders before him under Guardiola (Walker being the outlier).
Dias has none of those qualities, so we'll agree to disagree on capt worthiness.