David Coote | Charged with making indecent video of a child (p57)

happy_blue_apple said:
Obviously not found guilty yet but if you're being charged with actually making the video, they've almost certainly got some proof there.

People found guilty of that should never see the streets again. I don't think there's any rehabilitation for people like that. Not worth risking releasing them.

Time we start having those sexual predator and nonce jails where there's no release date.
Click to expand...
Totally agree.
Anyone who does anything to a child should be stoned to death in the street..I hope the **** dies a very painful death.
Any tree hunging soft **** who thinks that's not fair and against his human rights can get fucked as well
 
Talk about a house of cards collapsing around his ears. Now; I need to point out that, like us with the 115/130/pick a number, he's obviously innocent until proved guilty. But IF he's found guilty of this latest offence (the video), he's fucked. If some of the hard nuts in prison manage to get to him, he'll be a mess when they finish with him.
 
domalino said:
I wonder if this was discovered because of the videos of him slagging off klopp and doing lines got the police involved in looking at his phone, or was it just completely seperate?

He was doing a redemption press tour not that long ago with big sit down interviews, coming out and blaming hiding his sexuality for his poor decisions...he must have known this would come out as well?

Not that it matters that much, he's going to spend a long time in prison.
Click to expand...
Just screenshots of tweets that were posted up of accusations that he groomed a lad, supposedly tweeted from the lad himself. Im guessing he was reported by someone for that, possibly the lad himself. Police investigated him, found what they found, thus today's news report? ‍
 
ScottSinclair said:
Absolute scum obviously, but as a foreign speaker "making a video" is a confusing way to describe the charge considering from what I can see it means that the video is found on his phone but something he has been involved in creating.
Is there a reason why the formulations isn't more akin to "possesing a video" rather than "making" as I assume it must confuse some english speakers as well?

Not that it matters much (unless some other sicko has sent him the video without his consent at it is has stuck on his cloud or something) but being directly involved in harming children I'd say is a different level of scum. Willingly watching it is awful as well of course
Click to expand...
If you download a video, you do not possess the video, you have made a copy, maybe temporary.
The wording of the charge is to avoid ‘clever’ defences.
 
jimharri said:
Talk about a house of cards collapsing around his ears. Now; I need to point out that, like us with the 115/130/pick a number, he's obviously innocent until proved guilty. But IF he's found guilty of this latest offence (the video), he's fucked. If some of the hard nuts in prison manage to get to him, he'll be a mess when they finish with him.
Click to expand...
Good
 
domalino said:
I wonder if this was discovered because of the videos of him slagging off klopp and doing lines got the police involved in looking at his phone, or was it just completely seperate?

He was doing a redemption press tour not that long ago with big sit down interviews, coming out and blaming hiding his sexuality for his poor decisions...he must have known this would come out as well?

Not that it matters that much, he's going to spend a long time in prison.
Click to expand...
Presumably first offence. For one image, even of the most serious kind, I'd be surprised if he does any jail.
 
Betterdeedthan red said:
Totally agree.
Anyone who does anything to a child should be stoned to death in the street..I hope the **** dies a very painful death.
Any tree hunging soft **** who thinks that's not fair and against his human rights can get fucked as well
Click to expand...
Start a thread in Off Topic and I'm sure you'll get a healthy number who would disagree.
 
Franny 1234 said:
Good to see your post got several likes.
Loads of blues were praising him and defending him.
But the premier league most likely had a heads up he's a nonce.
Click to expand...

Blues were defending him for calling Klopp a twat not for being a nonce, that's the second post on here today conflating two completely different instances.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top