How so? Dickov score on 94:11.Not strictly correct.
How so? Dickov score on 94:11.Not strictly correct.
To equalise. We won on penalties.How so? Dickov score on 94:11.
Ah of course, Doh!To equalise. We won on penalties.
It certainly felt like we’d won though!Ah of course, Doh!
XG is limited because it assumes players' finishing ability is consistent throughout the league, likewise the goalkeeping.According to the understat xG model, City have been the best team in the PL so far, marginally better than Palace. How come? Well, we weren't that bad vs Spurs and Brighton, whereas Liverpool were lucky in several games. They haven't been better than us. Arsenal haven't been brilliant either. They couldn't create more chances than us at their ground despite being the fresher team (but if they beat Newcastle, then things change somewhat).
Many on here are heavily influenced by the actual results and leave little room for luck and other factors (like a short preseason and injuries). When Liverpool win, it's because they are good and bought expensive players. When we don't win, it's because we aren't good (Pep is finished, the players are old or lack quality, and so on).
We haven't been great by any means. But we have been really good after the international break. If Rodri stays fit, we'll compete.
The key is getting everyone fit and KEEPING them fit, then beating the dippers twice !!Hope we at least challenge next few weeks key and getting cherki going
Games last for 90 mins plus injury time. Scorelines at 60-70 mins mean nothing.Or we lost to 2 half decent teams and beat shit ones including a 10 man Napoli? Burnley, who are 17th, held their own against us for 60-70 minutes yesterday and the 5-1 flattered us. It reminds me of last seasons start where our results (8 wins and 2 draws) were papering over the cracks until mid October when we got just 1 win in 13.
Hope your right though.
Napoli were top of Serie A at kick off tonight. AC Milan are beating them 2-0, though, and have gone above them on GD. They're no mugs.Games last for 90 mins plus injury time. Scorelines at 60-70 mins mean nothing.
Napoli hadn’t lost since February. Elite teams don’t fall to pieces when a man gets sent off and Napoli made a predictably good fist of thwarting our attacks until Phil and big Erl produced that moment of magic
And Arse once.The key is getting everyone fit and KEEPING them fit, then beating the dippers twice !!
According to the only stat that matters, points, we've not been the best team in the PL so far.According to the understat xG model, City have been the best team in the PL so far, marginally better than Palace. How come? Well, we weren't that bad vs Spurs and Brighton, whereas Liverpool were lucky in several games. They haven't been better than us. Arsenal haven't been brilliant either. They couldn't create more chances than us at their ground despite being the fresher team (but if they beat Newcastle, then things change somewhat).
Many on here are heavily influenced by the actual results and leave little room for luck and other factors (like a short preseason and injuries). When Liverpool win, it's because they are good and bought expensive players. When we don't win, it's because we aren't good (Pep is finished, the players are old or lack quality, and so on).
We haven't been great by any means. But we have been really good after the international break. If Rodri stays fit, we'll compete.
Were freakishly good, Salah looks spent, looks like the inhaler use has taken its toll on himXG is limited because it assumes players' finishing ability is consistent throughout the league, likewise the goalkeeping.
Liverpool always outperform their XG because Salah and Alisson are both freakishly good.
Too early to say but I think come Christmas I think we’ll be there or there abouts, bar Liverpool I don’t think there’s a team better than us, and I think our current crop has the potential to rank supreme over the longer term.