Epstein / Andrew Mountbatten Windsor / Maxwell

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
Credit should go to Starmer here imho. No way that the ex Prince Andrew did this himself, at all, and likely that the King did this after govt pressure so to do. The reversal of constitutional norms but practically how it works, the govt exert pressure over the monarchy for the greater good and fair play to Charlie - he has chopped his brother off at the knees for letting the side down too many times. This will have been done by Starmer though, and he cant say so.
 
BlueHammer85 said:
the bbc helped bring him down.
Click to expand...

what makes it all mad is that the Newsnight/Maitlis was the straw that broke the camels back - he did it against his advisers advice and even Maitlis was staggered by what he said. There was clearly an arrogance, a lack of self awareness that was staggering - a wrong 'un booted out. Let him publish whatever he wants they have put him into the "well he would say that wouldn't he?" position. If he was his mums favourite then he further disgraces her memory.
 
I've posted similar before, but I think it bears repeating.
I have an ex colleague friend of mine that did 2 stints in the RAF. A decent human being, decorated, and a quiet, unassuming man. A talented engineer, and a very private individual. He didn't generally discuss what he did in the forces, and I respected that, even though I knew he had tales to tell. He preferred to keep them to himself. Fair enough.
Then one day the subject of Prince Andrew came up. He had met him a few times.
This kindly, almost shy fella started to get quite animated, he told me that this Prince Andrew fellow was the rudest, most unpleasant individual he had ever met. No sense of reality, he talked down to everyone he met, basically a self entitled ****.
I trust this mans opinion.
Losing his titles? The **** should be strung up.
 
Uncle Wally One Ball said:
Credit should go to Starmer here imho. No way that the ex Prince Andrew did this himself, at all, and likely that the King did this after govt pressure so to do. The reversal of constitutional norms but practically how it works, the govt exert pressure over the monarchy for the greater good and fair play to Charlie - he has chopped his brother off at the knees for letting the side down too many times. This will have been done by Starmer though, and he cant say so.
Click to expand...
Lol, starmer couldn't organise a solo wank, never mind stripping a Royal of his titles.
 
crublue1 said:
I've posted similar before, but I think it bears repeating.
I have an ex colleague friend of mine that did 2 stints in the RAF. A decent human being, decorated, and a quiet, unassuming man. A talented engineer, and a very private individual. He didn't generally discuss what he did in the forces, and I respected that, even though I knew he had tales to tell. He preferred to keep them to himself. Fair enough.
Then one day the subject of Prince Andrew came up. He had met him a few times.
This kindly, almost shy fella started to get quite animated, he told me that this Prince Andrew fellow was the rudest, most unpleasant individual he had ever met. No sense of reality, he talked down to everyone he met, basically a self entitled ****.
I trust this mans opinion.
Losing his titles? The **** should be strung up.
Click to expand...
Deadright.
 
lefty goldblatt said:
View attachment 172612
Click to expand...
I don't know what they have done to the kids.not for sure....
But what I do know.is that on the sannderinghame estate on boxing day
A few years ago. A Beautiful bird of prey . the Hen Harrier was shot dead .
Anybody who has the audacity to shoot a Hen Harrier from the skies is evil.
In my book.
These birds display the most delicate and amazing courtship behavior......
To shoot one .you must be sick.
A thing of beauty.
 
Allegedly, in the hours prior to the release of that infamous photograph of the sweaty nonce with his are around a woman he'd 'never met' he gave a Met police officer the girls DoB and Social Security number so they could 'dig up dirt' on her in order for him to discredit her.

Just interested to know how he got those highly sensitive details of a girl he'd never met???

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top