I’d add Peter sutcliffe , Brady and Hindley as examples of terrorising communities but not being classed as such .Behave. No-one is celebrating anything.
Terrorist incident or not, it’s a shocking crime yet we’ve got dickheads trying to score points FFS.
By the way, mass shootings in Hungerford, Dunblane, and Cumbria weren’t classed as terrorist incidents. And no, people weren’t celebrating any of those either.
Trying to understand the logistics of this incident. The train was Doncaster to King’s Cross and was stopped unofficially at Huntingdon. Where would the last official stop have been before it was diverted? Would there have been other planned stops between that point and King’s Cross?
Both born and raised in Britain yeahWeren't the pair of cunts that decapitated Lee Rigby British citizens as well
It’s terrorist by definition.. any other description is designed to misleadThe terrorism definition is ridiculous.
The act of attacking multiple defenseless and trapped people on a train in such a savage way is nothing else other than terrorising.
The fact that they say this isn't terrorism, does nothing but downplay the incident.
To the point where snowflakes as witnessed on this thread are celebrating that its not deemed as terrorism.
Ive just seen a quote from that BTP officer... "nothing to suggest terror incident"
I don't give a shit whether there were racial, religious or political motivations, what happened last night to those victims and even others on that train that witnessed it, is nothing other than a terror incident.
Don't think it was "diverted", just stopped at the first station after the incident, so that it could be dealt with quickly.Trying to understand the logistics of this incident. The train was Doncaster to King’s Cross and was stopped unofficially at Huntingdon. Where would the last official stop have been before it was diverted? Would there have been other planned stops between that point and King’s Cross?
Yep - Fred and Rose West too. Shipman was another.I’d add Peter sutcliffe , Brady and Hindley as examples of terrorising communities but not being classed as such .
Yes, diverted was the incorrect word, apologies.Don't think it was "diverted", just stopped at the first station after the incident, so that it could be dealt with quickly.
What political, religious, racial, or ideological goals were they aiming at changing?I’d add Peter sutcliffe , Brady and Hindley as examples of terrorising communities but not being classed as such .
Terrorism Act 2000 provided a means of classifying incidents as terrorist acts.I’d add Peter sutcliffe , Brady and Hindley as examples of terrorising communities but not being classed as such .
Possible but very far fetched.Maybe a robbing? Someone has stepped in and then it’s gone properly off and snowballed?
The definition of "terrorism", in a nutshell, is an act designed to further a political goal. Until we know more, it's hard to say if this was a terrorist incident or not.It’s terrorist by definition.. any other description is designed to mislead
Fucking idiot. The Heaton Park synagogue attacker was a British citizen, as were the 7/7 ones.A few posters from last night will be gutted that the two people arrested are British citizens…. Makes it much harder to spin their racist narrative.
Will you be disappointed if they aren't Muslims?I don’t’t really give a bollocks what colour skin the attackers had but I sure am looking forward to finding out what religion they were.
Well, really all we have to ban is men.Well, ban anything sharp!
Cos it was all fine before "they" came.
And then ban hands, feet, hammers, cars, fire...