Premier League Games | 1/2/3 Nov '25

Ball in his control, taken out…must be pen touch or not

To get some consistency and certainty back with VAR, I'm happy for a touch to mean no penalty. Unfortunately for VAR's sake the rules need to be simpler.

I actually thought it looked nailed on at first but I actually think the touch was enough.

The Pope one on Gyokeres was worse but I said back then they should just make it so a defensive touch on the ball means no penalty, so I have to be consistent.
 
The game is restarted after any overturned penalty decision with a drop ball to the defending keeper. Bit of a weird rule, especially if the ball has naturally gone out of play after the incident.
If the ref delayed calling a penalty to after the ball has gone out, it would've been a corner. Since the ref blew his whistle before the ball went out, it's a dropped ball. I'm sure you know this, just adding context for others.
 
Surely then it's a corner as the Newcastle lad touched the ball last?

Well the moment the referee blows for the penalty the ball is dead at the point the foul is made - so anything that happens after that point, the ball is not technically in play.

On this occasion it seems like it should be an obvious corner because the ball went out of play immediately after the tackle, but there would be other scenarios where the players stop at the referee's whistle and maybe they could have prevented it going out. Then you end up with all kinds of weird grey areas of whether something should be a goal kick, corner, drop ball etc.

So the simplest thing to do is what they have done - just say, if a penalty is overturned it's a drop ball.

I kind of get it, no matter what stance they take there's going to be scenarios that are a pain in the arse, so this is just the most black and white version to take subjectivity out of it.
 
Blimey, wouldn’t have predicted this after five minutes. Fair play to West Ham, they’ve been the better team.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top