Greenland and Donald Trump.

My thoughts ? OK

Trump knows he could take it anytime he wants to and no one in Nato could do Jack shit about it.
The only reason he wont take it is if he makes demands they all have to abide by, i.e. buy American tanks planes and guns.

Sadly I think he will do it as its then gives him great levarage over Canada.
 
Didn’t know any of this!

No, no other country has owned Greenland after World War II. It has remained under **Danish sovereignty** throughout that period and to the present day (as of January 2026).

### During WWII (1940–1945)
- Nazi Germany occupied Denmark in April 1940, cutting off communication with Greenland.
- The United States stepped in to protect and defend the island (to prevent potential German use of it, e.g., for weather stations or bases).
- In April 1941, the U.S. signed an agreement with the Danish ambassador in Washington (acting independently), allowing U.S. forces to build bases and occupy parts of Greenland for defense purposes.
- This made Greenland a **de facto U.S. protectorate** during the war, with American administration of certain affairs, but it was **temporary and not a transfer of ownership**.

### After WWII (1945 onward)
- Once the war ended and Denmark was liberated, full control and sovereignty **returned to Denmark** without interruption.
- In 1946, the U.S. secretly offered to buy Greenland from Denmark for $100 million (in gold), citing strategic importance during the emerging Cold War. Denmark firmly rejected the offer.
- No sale or transfer occurred.
- Instead, Denmark integrated Greenland more closely: In 1953, its colonial status ended, and it became an equal part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
- The U.S. was allowed to maintain and expand military bases (like Thule Air Base) under agreements with Denmark, but this is usage rights, not ownership.
- Greenland gained home rule in 1979 and expanded self-rule in 2009, handling most internal matters, while Denmark manages foreign affairs, defense, and currency.

There have been earlier U.S. interests (e.g., ideas in the 1860s and 1910s), and more recent discussions (like in 2019), but none resulted in any change of ownership. Greenland has always been Danish territory post-WWII, with no other country ever owning it.
 
As others have already said, the rationale that the US need it for security reasons falls apart under the most negligible of scrutiny. It's NATO territory, the US is a member of NATO, and they already have bases on the island anyway. This isn't some menacing state that is threatening US sovereignty.

The rhetoric of his lackeys has taken a telling shift; "our hemisphere", "nobody will fight us", "why should Denmark have a claim to Greenland". This rhetoric is illustrative as to why he wants it, because he's an imperialist ****. And he's an imperialist **** whose time is running out. That's the reason. Anyone who can't see that is either a.) a total fucking idiot, or b.) a cultist. At least a.) can be forgiven.

However, I don't think he'll claim Greenland. He's an unhinged maniac, but I think this would be his Rubicon.
 
I can't see any way the USA will fall out big time with Europe.

He will just steam in and take it with no resistance, no lives lost and it will all be forgotten about in six months.

The entire population of Greenland is like a full Etihad.

Rather America than Russia or China, but I can't see Putin taking this lying down.
Maybe he'll give Vlad Alaska?
 
If the rest of nato station ships, planes, etc there. Would he still attack?
Who would organise that ?
He already has a huge base there so it would be very easy to get troops in.
Nato is an agreement nothing more.
Who would be in charge of a Nato force ?
Which leader would want body bags of dead British/French soldiers on Sky tv 24 hours a day.
Nato responded for Bosnia but that is totally different to the US.

We wouldn't react with military and he knows it.
 
Denmark should privately ask a number of European countries to put boots on the ground in Greenland to defend it on the basis that it is a key strategic asset for Europe and NATO. Could those troops defend against a US attack if one came? Almost certainly not. Having to take on a coalition of defensive forces with boots on the ground completely changes the dynamics of the decision to invade though and surely makes it politically untenable for him.

The implications of this situation are ridiculous though. We could end up in a situation where the first time NATO Article 5 is triggered by a country other than the US is in defence of that country against the US.
 
I can't see any way the USA will fall out big time with Europe.

He will just steam in and take it with no resistance, no lives lost and it will all be forgotten about in six months.

The entire population of Greenland is like a full Etihad.

Rather America than Russia or China, but I can't see Putin taking this lying down.
You think NATO is going to allow someone to invade and annex NATO territory with no resistance?

You realise there's several nuclear armed states in NATO right?
 
A nuclear exchange over a remote, barely habitable island would probably be a fitting end to humanity but I think a pressure campaign is much more likely than American military action let alone a transatlantic war.
 
Only thing we could reasonably do in response would be to impose sanctions on the US. We could do some fairly minor ones at the outset with a threat to go further, Trump won’t give a fuck probably. So we will probably do nowt.
Sell US bonds and collapse their economy, they will get rid of him within weeks, billionaires want to stay billionaires
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top