Greenland / Trump nonsense.

Isn't it more a case of which side Greenland/Denmark wish to take?

Are they content having the pesky Ruskies and Chinese occupying the seas surrounding their country or would they prefer some kind of protection from the US? Quite a simple question really.... you can complicate it all you like by making all kinds of assumptions but the actual reality is West or East?

Going with the US would help reduce the risk of major conflict...
What threat to Greenland itself do you see coming from the East?
 
Greenland population approx 55,000 - "gift" $2 million each if they vote to join the US and become US citizens - job done for £110,000,000,000 - 13.2% of the current U.S. defence budget !
 
Isn't it more a case of which side Greenland/Denmark wish to take?

Are they content having the pesky Ruskies and Chinese occupying the seas surrounding their country or would they prefer some kind of protection from the US? Quite a simple question really.... you can complicate it all you like by making all kinds of assumptions but the actual reality is West or East?

Going with the US would help reduce the risk of major conflict...
So then you think Greenland is like a whore who should chose to work for a pimp who beats her and takes a cut of her earnings vs. staying an independent contractor subject to street risk.

That’s what you’ve reduced free people and nations to.

Well done.
 
Last edited:
So then you think Greenland is like a whore who should chose to work for a pimp who beats her and takes a cut of her earnings vs. staying an independent contractor subject to street risk.

Thanks what you’ve reduced free people and nations to.

Well done.
Errrr no.

Stand up and fight a battle then if they believe it is worth it.... I've normally respected your posts, but this analogy is, to put it kindly, pathetic.
 
He's jostling for position on something (possibly NATO spending or similar).

He's not taking Greenland in my humble opinion...........
I agree, I suspect he has another motive at play.
He was 100% right to call the NATO counties out for not putting in what they committed to.
I reckon he is trying to prove a point about defence spending….not sure what the point is.
Obviously if they just invaded (which they won’t) it would be completely wrong and would probably end him
 
The reality is that whether Greenland is under Danish sovereignty or independent, the strategic location means they'll always be kept on a short leash by the interests of northern members of NATO, including Canada, the UK and the Nordics. They can't defend themselves and NATO isn't going to allow them to align with Russia or China in any meaningful respect. Large majorities of Greenlanders support independence in polls and have done for years, but there's a reason Denmark isn't giving them a vote.
 
Errrr no.

Stand up and fight a battle then if they believe it is worth it.... I've normally respected your posts, but this analogy is, to put it kindly, pathetic.
Mate, I don’t think Greenland is under any real threat from China and Russia is my point. Maybe I should have been clearer. While there’s a big debate here over Venezuela, there is no deep support in the U.S. nor anywhere for our nation using military force in Greenland. Even a good number of the cultists think that’s unnecessary.
 
Don’t give up your day job
Enlighten me - you don't think Trump could encourage the Greenlanders to demand a referendum/vote and $2m a piece wouldn't swing the vote his way ... Better than taking it by force and f uping Nato. All for slightly more than 10% of the US's yearly defence budget !
 
it’s not for sale.
And, what exactly does “just take it” look like? Not a dig at you btw, but this term is banded often

Exactly what it says. They'll take it. One way or another it will end up with the Americans. No one can stop them. I wish they could as they are horrible bastards and always have been.
 
Enlighten me - you don't think Trump could encourage the Greenlanders to demand a referendum/vote and $2m a piece wouldn't swing the vote his way ... Better than taking it by force and f uping Nato. All for slightly more than 10% of the US's yearly defence budget !
Well, first point is it’s up to Denmark whether they want to sell and that decision has been made

so, playing out your scenario, do you believe Trump will allow what will now be seen as aliens , to keep that money?
 
Enlighten me - you don't think Trump could encourage the Greenlanders to demand a referendum/vote and $2m a piece wouldn't swing the vote his way ... Better than taking it by force and f uping Nato. All for slightly more than 10% of the US's yearly defence budget !
What do you think would happen to the inflation rate in Greenland if he did that?
 
Well, first point is it’s up to Denmark whether they want to sell and that decision has been made

so, playing out your scenario, do you believe Trump will allow what will now be seen as aliens , to keep that money?
I didn't say anything about paying the Danes ! His play would be to bypass the Danes - they keep saying they will respect the will of the Greenlanders - hence why i mentioned a referendum / forcing a vote. $2m for each person in Greenland would create a hell of a lot of momentum for a vote /referendum. For that sort of money they would probably run the Danes out of Greenland themselves !
 
What do you think would happen to the inflation rate in Greenland if he did that?
Don't think it would have much impact on inflation - they don't produce much anyway - it is all imported ! Many of them might even opt to go to the US with their new found US citizenship.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top