Surprised at that post from him. Usually seems like he has his head screwed on, but that was, as you say, as if he’s spent too much time on the socials.Doesnt sound like rational thinking to me that mate. Break needed from youtube I think
Stop the world and get off. Ignore the news, just concentrate on your world. It all carries on but doesn't really affect you. Just watch everyone else getting mired up in it all, with your feet up. The world will carry on.Just been speaking about this whole thing with my wife and my parents. I've been honest with them, something has broken inside of me since all the Epstein files and pictures came out. It turns out all the nutty conspiracy theories about secret cabals of billionaires running the world, rigging elections, pulling all the strings, raping children in hotel rooms and expensive suites, covering it all up, giving each other backhanders, taking pictures of their crimes, smiling in front of the rest of the world and acting like saints, giggling while wishing for the downfall of decent society - all true.
It's fucking bonkers. Makes you wonder what the point of it all is, makes you realise nothing will ever change, it's enough to make you give up.
I'd expect it from Andrew, Trump, and them lot. Even Bill Gates wasn't a surprise. I've accepted for a long, long time as well that Queenie and Phillip and Charles probably all know/knew. But even fucking Noam Chomsky was in this circle. One of the greatest progressive thinkers and writers of the 20th century, hanging around on private planes with Epstein and writing chatty emails to fucking Steve Bannon. All of them in it together.
Stick them all on a bus and drive it off a cliff for all I care. The world would be better off.
We've all been hoodwinked by them and they've raped thousands of children while seizing control of everything. They murdered Epstein to stop him talking, they murdered Virginia Giuffre to stop her telling her full story. I'd be surprised if Andrew's life wasn't currently in danger right now before he really opens his flabby fucking jowls to the police.
Makes you want to leave it all behind. From now on it's just my wife, our pets, our house, my family and friends. I can't change anything else. Maybe we'll buy a house far away from anyone else, in the middle of fucking nowhere, on the edge of a farm, and live out our adult days away from all the noise.
You’re still going aren’t you.The Duchy also charges for fish landed at ports ... this is a tax which will be ,no doubt, passed on to the customer.
The fees charged by Duchy for landing fish can vary based on the port and specific regulations. Here are some key points:
- Dues on Fish Landed: For the first £10,000 value of fish landed per visit, a fee of 2.20p per £1 value applies. For any excess over £10,000, the fee is 1.60p per £1 value.
1- Vessel Dues: Vessels landing fish for commercial sale are charged based on the value landed, with specific rates set by the port authority.
1- Port-Specific Charges: Charges may also vary by port, such as Forth Ports and Peterhead Port, which have their own fee structures for vessel movements and landing.
2
For the most accurate and up-to-date information, it is recommended to check with the specific port authority or their official website.
The Crown also gets your estate should you die without a will and there are no surviving relatives (Bona Vacantia)
Time for pitchforks and torches methinks....
The trouble is that the released files show what YounyBob has said is suggested to be true.Doesnt sound like rational thinking to me that mate. Break needed from youtube I think
Licence.You’re still going aren’t you.
The Duchy of Lancaster does not charge for fishing imports, HMRC does. You will need a license to fish there though, like a lot of places in the UK.
Put the pitchfork down, you’re more likely to harm yourself.
By they I meant the monarchy itself, the lineage, but I suspect you knew that and are being disingenuous.Didn’t realise the Queen and Charles were centuries old?
it’s funny how the goal posts keep moving by every post, two pages ago people were claiming they didn’t make a profit and it was tax payers money, then it was tax payers funding the duchy to make a profit, now it’s stolen land from centuries ago.
I have had a quick look, as you suggested, Edward III created it for his son, it then passed to House Lancashire who then got the Crown.
Someone had probably been fucked over for it 700 years ago, but I’m not sure what that has to do with 2026, other than to create false outrage for anti monarchists.
By the way, in 2026, the King’s brother is a fucking nonce and traitor to his country, can we get back to discussing that now please?
Fuck sake I’ve had a shockerLicence.
By they I meant the monarchy itself, the lineage, but I suspect you knew that and are being disingenuous.
And no moving of the goal posts, I asked you where that Duchy of Lancaster money came from, and yes, it is from land that was stolen centuries ago, as you yourself have now discovered. Let's continue with your private enterprise fantasy, and take your forestry bullet point. Did the monarch put any work into building this timber business? Did his mother? Tell you what, I'll allow for generations of idle nepotism, and go back to Victoria; did she graft to put this business together? No? Let's expand on your private enterprise fantasy; do you think if any of these "businesses" were to go under then the Royal Family would suffer the consequences? Are they bound to the same risks and occupational vicissitudes as any other ordinary business owner? No, of course they're not. By the way, there's this thing called the sovereign grant; it's a mechanism forced upon our government to give over a £100m every year to keep these parasites living in luxury; and yes, that comes from the public purse.
They're a relic of feudalism, anybody with an ounce of common sense can see what an affront they are. But they get away with it because they wave at enough gullible pillocks and spout platitudinous bollocks on the TV one day every year.
Licence.
I liken the Royal family to the EUBy they I meant the monarchy itself, the lineage, but I suspect you knew that and are being disingenuous.
And no moving of the goal posts, I asked you where that Duchy of Lancaster money came from, and yes, it is from land that was stolen centuries ago, as you yourself have now discovered. Let's continue with your private enterprise fantasy, and take your forestry bullet point. Did the monarch put any work into building this timber business? Did his mother? Tell you what, I'll allow for generations of idle nepotism, and go back to Victoria; did she graft to put this business together? No? Let's expand on your private enterprise fantasy; do you think if any of these "businesses" were to go under then the Royal Family would suffer the consequences? Are they bound to the same risks and occupational vicissitudes as any other ordinary business owner? No, of course they're not. By the way, there's this thing called the sovereign grant; it's a mechanism forced upon our government to give over a £100m every year to keep these parasites living in luxury; and yes, that comes from the public purse.
They're a relic of feudalism, anybody with an ounce of common sense can see what an affront they are. But they get away with it because they wave at enough gullible pillocks and spout platitudinous bollocks on the TV one day every year.
I didn't have a clue about the Duchy of Lancaster, correct. But I knew full well the answer I'd find at the end of my search, and the reason it exists. You didn't answer any of my questions. I would ask you how you feel about mummy paying for the nonce's innocence, and whether there's a degree of complicity to that fact, but honestly you're boring the fuck out of me now, and your sycophancy will just cloud your judgement.You didn’t have a clue either, don’t pretend you knew the history of the duchy of fucking Lancaster before yesterday. I presumed someone had been fucked over, that’s what I said. Most wealth has been acquired with some poor **** being on the receiving end.
The original point was that someone claimed it was taxpayers that funded Andrews settlement money, I rightly pointed out that was false.
Now you and a few others keep moving goalposts to why the monarchy is bad in different ways, I’ve got no interest in spending all day arguing with bitter socialists to be honest and going on a wild goose chase of different reasons why you think the monarchy shouldn’t exist.
I’d rather talk about Andrew and what’s going on with the Epstein files, not why the monarchy should or shouldn’t exist because of something Edward III did to acquire land in the 14th century.
Have a day off.
I had already answered the question on the Queen paying the settlement, it’s what set the whole nonsense topic on taxpayer vs private income debate. It’s still there if you go back a few pages.I didn't have a clue about the Duchy of Lancaster, correct. But I knew full well the answer I'd find at the end of my search, and the reason it exists. You didn't answer any of my questions. I would ask you how you feel about mummy paying for the nonce's innocence, and whether there's a degree of complicity to that fact, but honestly you're boring the fuck out of me now, and your sycophancy will just cloud your judgement.
And your socialist gibe was funny. Unoriginal for posters like yourself, but funny.
Genuine question, have you spent time reading the files that have been released? Like YB, I’m no conspiracy theorist, got zero time for a lot of them. But the files are absolutely insane and it definitely suggests what YB posted. He’s only giving his opinion on what he’s seen released.Surprised at that post from him. Usually seems like he has his head screwed on, but that was, as you say, as if he’s spent too much time on the socials.
I had to giggle at the end, too. Smacked of some slag who has been jilted yet again, and tells Facebook it’s just her and the kids from now on. lol.
Bob said they’re all in on it, it being what has been described by the nutty conspiracy theorists. Have you ever read what those imbeciles insist happens? That think all of the rich and famous are eating babies at secret parties. Raping kids on a daily basis, again at parties. Secret symbols on photos. Devils. The anti Christ. It ranges from Tom Hanks to Lady Gaga. It’s comical what they say goes on.The trouble is that the released files show what YounyBob has said is suggested to be true.
No I’ve not. I have no desire to read about such things.Genuine question, have you spent time reading the files that have been released? Like YB, I’m no conspiracy theorist, got zero time for a lot of them. But the files are absolutely insane and it definitely suggests what YB posted. He’s only giving his opinion on what he’s seen released.
When did the Romans fuck us up?Suppose we lived like that before the romans turned up and fucked Britan up. I am not religious at all but have sort of been on the pagan side recently. Best thing I have ever done moving to the countryside.
Not necessarily the people you’ve quoted and not all of them, but that stuff is in the files or at least implied. It’s bonkers, I agree, but it’s there.Bob said they’re all in on it, it being what has been described by the nutty conspiracy theorists. Have you ever read what those imbeciles insist happens? That think all of the rich and famous are eating babies at secret parties. Raping kids on a daily basis, again at parties. Secret symbols on photos. Devils. The anti Christ. It ranges from Tom Hanks to Lady Gaga. It’s comical what they say goes on.
Bob likely unintentionally exaggerated his feelings, because whilst there are some despicable cunts out there, what the ‘nutty conspiracy theorists’ say is just a load of morons chatting absolute shit to come across as edgy and in the know.
I was surprised at his post if truth be told. Instead of being honest with his wife and parents about being broke by it, he should switch the news off, stay offline and talk
About the good in life, of which there is plenty, and which doesn’t make a person want to end it all.
Not necessarily the people you’ve quoted and not all of them, but that stuff is in the files or at least implied. It’s bonkers, I agree, but it’s there.
My view is that it needs to all be confirmed as true or not true as soon as possible, arrests need to happen and all of the files, with the redacted bits shown.
I’m not saying it’s true but it’s in the files.
Some of it will be true, basically because human beings are capable of horrible to each other, famous or otherwise.Not necessarily the people you’ve quoted and not all of them, but that stuff is in the files or at least implied. It’s bonkers, I agree, but it’s there.
My view is that it needs to all be confirmed as true or not true as soon as possible, arrests need to happen and all of the files, with the redacted bits shown.
I’m not saying it’s true but it’s in the files.