We’re not going to be allowed to win it, are we? Three good penalty shouts turned down with barely a second glance
The team has problems, well known and recorded. Management decisions (or non decisions) bound to define a team's (any team's) campaign:
Huge drop in terms of individual quality, size of the squad. Which determine a) how competitive our game is, and b) our energy levels. It's going on for 6 years, we got away with it the first 4 because of the Guardiola factor and the sactifice of our boys, now history and nature are taking their revenge. Lessons have not been learnt, as simple as that...
What you are saying is yesterday's news. This club has been operating in a hostile environment for years, on - off the pitch. We have accepted that situation as something natural, watching Pep building teams able to beat rivals
as well as referees. It's not natural, I'm sorry but it's not. And it cannot continue under the circumstances, exactly because of the reasons I have mentioned above. We keep playing football in slow motion, controlling proceedings as much as we can, exactly because we cannot run. But we are not a) as creative (and cynical) offensively, and b) as solid defensively, as we used to be. Inevitably, we are bound to a) struggle against opponents who are always fitter, fresher and sharper than us, and b) appear fragile against scums such as England...
Our performance tonight is anything but a surprise, it's the level I expected. We have a serious
problem in midfield -and I'm not blaming the boys, they're doing their best. A problem that WILL NOT be solved this season, by the way. Still a problem that defines balances (as well as creativity, as well as rhythm) all over the pitch. A problem that influences Pep's decisions in terms of line up, set-up, formation, game plan. A problem that leads to CONCESSIONS. Phil? He's struggling to get back in form, well he needs minutes for that, so I understand why he was used (and I agree). But there is a player for whom we spent good money in the summer, experienced and relatively fresh, yet once again he was not trusted to start (or even participate as a sub). He stayed on the bench. Any comment on that? So did Nico G, by the way. Would it be the same if we had somebody like Guimaraes, for example? Or Rice perhaps? Oh, I'm sorry, I forgot. The club tried but could not buy any of them...
As I said, all the above (as well as others), are well known. Do they mean that we deserved to be punished by that ****? Had we scored our chances, we could (and should) have won. We didn't, so England decided to act. The same Darren England who was operating as VAR at OT a few years ago, refusing to give that penalty to G. Jesus in the end. But it didn't matter because we won (0-2), right? Yeah, well in days like tonight it does matter. People who do not understand this (or pretend they don't) are naive. You see, in football victories are not always the outcome of remarkable performances, about 150 years of official football history provide enough proof for that. Despite our problems, City should have won tonight. Darren England is the reason City didn't. Period...
The way City have been treated by officials all these years is a fucking disgrace. The difference? Our team is not strong enough at the moment to beat the Englands of this world. Which is down to managerial decisions (or non decisions), as I've already said. But let's be clear: The club is fully aware of the problem, yet has decided to remain silent. Make of that whatever you wish. Pep kept his mouth shut for 10 years, before mentioning that Newcastle parody the other day. In the process Rodrigo followed, and as we know, it did not go unnoticed. I've said it numerous times: Everybody in that dressing room knows exactly what's going on for years, they were simply complying with the club's policy. In my eyes, the CEO as well as the Chairman are equally responsible for tolerating this shit...
Final comment, a bit personal: A few years ago I wrote: "
I live my life through City now". That's where I still am. Pep's City is way more than a team in my eyes, it's an ideal -and I love the club. All these years I have been trying to prepare myself for the worst, exactly because I was aware of our limitations. Leaving aside the refs, Pep's work has always been a struggle to deal with / control all kinds of limitations, in terms of personel, energy levels, you name it. He delivered, exactly because he is the best manager in the history of the sport, hands down. Also because his boys followed him, I mean they nearly died on the pitch. But it didn't have to be like this, it didn't have to be so fucking difficult. Yet the club keeps treating him as a magician, not a football manager. As a guy who will find solutions to all kinds of problems. That's the culture already developed in our hierarchy: With Pep we can save money (or should I say, make money), keep the net spend respectable, and still win. Well that's not exactly how they handled Mancini and Pelegrini, is it? Fortunes on players (and wages) who hardly made any difference, some of them hardly ever played. They both had more than enough resources at their disposal, which means sometimes more than "
2 equals in each position". Why? Insecurity apparently...
As for Guardiola? I will never forget the match at the Emirates, which gives you a clear measure of our situation these days. 3rd match in a week with the same lineup! With the team a moving hospital, Pep giving his best Helenio Herrera impression, and players who could hardly walk, never mind run. Yet the manager had to wait until 87' so as to introduce Savio, apparently he could not trust the boy for more minutes in such a game -and he was right. On the other hand,
Arteta brought people like Saka, Eze (who was considered surplus for City, I assume),
even Martinelli, from the bench! And guess what, it was the latter who scored in 90' + 2, saving Arsenal. How can that be possible for a club expected to compete at the highest possible level? What exactly are we debating here? Let's not pretend we do not understand what's going on. And let's not forget that this shit would never happen (and it did not happen) at City under Mancini or Pelegrini. Period...
I am not giving up, I don't think anybody in that dressing room is, either. But I have to prepare myself for the clear possibility of watching that **** celebrating in London at the end of the season. That man and his vanity. A man with such a ... noble vision about football. There is no way I am ever going to recover if we come to that, I know it. And I blame nobody but myself. I have failed completely to distance myself from the City reality, it's on me. Nevertheless I am not going to accuse the manager. And I'm not going to put the blame on any player. Young players like Savio need time. Jeremy? Arrived with a history of injury problems, has shown impressive progress under Pep, yet has scored 1 single goal in the PL. NOR? Again, impressive progress, I love the kid, I'm not going to point the finger on him for the 2 points dropped vs Chelsea, I'm sorry but inexperience (and fatigue) costs. And so on. You have seniors who have given their very soul for this team, struggling out there for a variety of issues. And you have new players (some of whom with a question mark over their ceiling) who have not yet met expectations...
Last season it was a gift to Slot and Liverpool. Is it Arteta's and Arsenal's time? Maybe City are not that greedy. Maybe City are too generous. Or maybe, just maybe, making a player out of Rico Lewis or Oscar Bob (who is no longer with us, by the way, but we did rely on him for half a season...), for example, is more important than winning the league. I apologize for mentioning their names, it's not their fault. It's on the club. Clearly on people who are getting paid serious money to make decisions that will support the team. Speaking for myself, I am not going to forget. And I am not going to forgive...