Zin 'messiah' Zimmer
Well-Known Member
Being called a solicitor is the rudest thing that I have read on this thread. ;)
Sorry our kid, it's all that GDM's fault (:
Being called a solicitor is the rudest thing that I have read on this thread. ;)
"There isn't any suggestion from me that there is a muslim conspiracy, indeed I believe the vast majority of Muslims would probably follow you're lead" (in shopping militants)
I assume you didn't read that sentence and have just made you're mind up on me being some kind of islamaphobic white supremacist?
Been cool chatting with you bro
Oh don't sulk. You cherry-picked a quote. Now you are playing the victim after throwing around some abusive generalisations. We can just disagree. It's fine, really."There isn't any suggestion from me that there is a muslim conspiracy, indeed I believe the vast majority of Muslims would probably follow you're lead" (in shopping militants)
I assume you didn't read that sentence and have just made you're mind up on me being some kind of islamaphobic white supremacist?
Been cool chatting with you bro
Both.
Look at the religious rallies that turn up in America with the placards damning homosexuality at Gay Pride events. Okay they aren't killing them, but it's the same message from the same type of book read by nutters (just of a lesser extreme).
Not sure that's a good example. I don't think Milosevic claimed to have any religiously-inspired motive for the mass murder of thousands of Croats and Bosnians. But you could look at the Holocaust and see the roots of German anti-semitism in the writings of Martin Luther and the legacy of anti-semitism this left on the Protestant church in Germany.More relevantly, we don't blame Christianity for the events in Serbia and Bosnia in the 90s.
Not sure that's a good example. I don't think Milosevic claimed to have any religiously-inspired motive for the mass murder of thousands of Croats and Bosnians. But you could look at the Holocaust and see the roots of German anti-semitism in the writings of Martin Luther and the legacy of anti-semitism this left on the Protestant church in Germany.
I'm sorry old chap, "abusive generalisations"? I have no idea where you've read anything of the sort from me. My argument has centred around my belief that SOME muslims know about ongoing indoctrination and choose to do nothing about it, SOME NOT ALL. Could you point out where the abuse is here because I'd hate to continue offending. I don't really get why you think I'm sulking, and the quote I "cherry picked" was relevant as it directly replied to you're comment. I'm neither an aggressor or a victim so I'm not really following why you have decided to adopt this standpoint. Guess we'll just just have to accept we have differing views.Oh don't sulk. You cherry-picked a quote. Now you are playing the victim after throwing around some abusive generalisations. We can just disagree. It's fine, really.
The Serbian military were close to the Orthodox Church. Same with the Croats and the Catholic Church. The former had Russia for 'friends' and the latter Germany [for ethnic reasons]. The poor old Bosnians had, er, the Albanians on a bad day.Not sure that's a good example. I don't think Milosevic claimed to have any religiously-inspired motive for the mass murder of thousands of Croats and Bosnians. But you could look at the Holocaust and see the roots of German anti-semitism in the writings of Martin Luther and the legacy of anti-semitism this left on the Protestant church in Germany.
It couldn't be more untrue...
I am not making a stand. I am simply telling you that it is abusive to suggest that there are 'some' Muslims [whatever that figure is] who are conspiring with terrorists. There clearly are a few. As I said before, an estimated 700 have gone to Syria [some children, sadly].I'm sorry old chap, "abusive generalisations"? I have no idea where you've read anything of the sort from me. My argument has centred around my belief that SOME muslims know about ongoing indoctrination and choose to do nothing about it, SOME NOT ALL. Could you point out where the abuse is here because I'd hate to continue offending. I don't really get why you think I'm sulking, and the quote I "cherry picked" was relevant as it directly replied to you're comment. I'm neither an aggressor or a victim so I'm not really following why you have decided to adopt this standpoint. Guess we'll just just have to accept we have differing views.
thats untrue ?
Have you contradicted yourself there. I'm abusive for suggesting "some mulsims are aware of indoctrination", yet you appear to (finally) concede I have a point by saying "there clearly are a few" so are you now just as abusive as me? I'm confused. For the record I've tried to avoid putting figures other than saying "some" out there as clearly no-one knows and putting numbers on this would be pure speculation. Certainly nowhere have I suggested that 2 million people know about it. I would however suggest its a bit more than the "few" you suggest.I am not making a stand. I am simply telling you that it is abusive to suggest that there are 'some' Muslims [whatever that figure is] who are conspiring with terrorists. There clearly are a few. As I said before, an estimated 700 have gone to Syria [some children, sadly].
In the end, you are talking about, what, a few thousand people across the UK? Out of 2 million. Way less than one percent. And you expect the 2 million to know about it? Seriously? Once again, how?
Whatever the premise is, its certainly not abusive.you don't know how many it is but suggest a bit more than a few. What's the premise of that assumption?
That just sounds like a smear campaign. You make dangerous inferences. Highly irresponsible.Have you contradicted yourself there. I'm abusive for suggesting "some mulsims are aware of indoctrination", yet you appear to (finally) concede I have a point by saying "there clearly are a few" so are you now just as abusive as me? I'm confused. For the record I've tried to avoid putting figures other than saying "some" out there as clearly no-one knows and putting numbers on this would be pure speculation. Certainly nowhere have I suggested that 2 million people know about it. I would however suggest its a bit more than the "few" you suggest.
"We keep on being told that religion, whatever its imperfections, at least instills morality. On every side, there is conclusive evidence that the contrary is the case and that faith causes people to be more mean, more selfish, and perhaps above all, more stupid." ― Christopher Hitchens
you don't know how many it is but suggest a bit more than a few. What's the premise of that assumption?
Thank you.Either way humans find a desire and need to be divisive, it is in our blood and always has been, religion just finds a different justification for it. The worlds problems wouldn't be solved with or without religion as the world did not start in 0AD. Conflict has been with us since the dawn of our race. I think deep down our brains are just wired to want a good scrap.
The worlds problems wouldn't be solved with or without religion as the world did not start in 0AD.