Champions2012!
Well-Known Member
As a dedicated City fan, if I could pick one manager for Chelsea next season, I'd pick Pellegrini.
Rather arse got him
As a dedicated City fan, if I could pick one manager for Chelsea next season, I'd pick Pellegrini.
We must have had a near identical number of managers as them in that time?It looks pretty much nailed on he will be leaving at the end of the season.
Question he may want to ask himself is -Chelsea have had 16 manages since 92/93 season lasting an average of 1.5 years in charge - does he want go to a club who sack managers on a regular basis plus they have a ageing squad!?
We must have had a near identical number of managers as them in that time?
Is this where pellegrini"s win percentage gets mentioned?Which PL manager has a better record than him over the past 2 and a half years?
Couldn't care at all. I'd be devastated if Mancini ended up there though. And therein lies the problem - Pellegrini is a tactical dinosaur. Every time we play a game now teams have a plan. Even arsenal sat in at home nice and compact and hit us on break. Our naive schoolboy tactics are the same week in week out. Teams no how to beat us. Our record this season is fucking abysmal. Pellegrini has spent a fortune and IMO the team is worse now than it was 2-3 years ago.
That's funny. Gazetta described Mancini as a tactical dinasour the weekend just gone. Described his football as "prehistoric" and that Italy had not seen he like in 30 years. Pretty scathing about a supposed tactical genius!
He was better than I thought in 2013-2014. Since then, he's returned to my previously modest expectations of him.some of our fans would realize manuel was much better than they thought, would be happy for him, deserves a top job but i think he would be a much better fit for arsenal instead of chelsea, much less pressure of winning the title and have good attacking players