Let's all laugh at the Daily Mail

Robert Draper you simply make stuff up, if uk sport reporting had any standards of decency you would fall foul of them.
Such as it is though you are a pitiful lying rag click baiter in a sea of pitiful rag arse licking so called reporters whose job has changed from reporting to "How do we get most clicks and beat the other papers", meh fuck em, they deserve to have plummeting sales.
 
To be honest, I don't think they (or any of the other papers) believe that shit when they write it. They just know it'll generate clicks linking him with United or Arsenal, so I don't think they're bothered if it's accurate or not.
'

Their whole business runs on this.

The "front" of their paper is full of misreporting and lies but it's led their website to be the 1# most visited in the world. Scary really.

Don't know where their sport/football section ranks in web hits but I imagine it's near the top.
 
The op is spot on.
However, it is not just sport that the DM desecrates, their political reporting is definitely not to be laughed at, pure poison parcelled up and presented as news.
There is enough voters in this country who believe the press are incapable of lying, "it must be true it was in the papers".
There was a time when the papers had a reputation to live up to,
Murdoch put paid to that with his gutterpress, phonehacking lying editors.
 
The point is football sports writers shit themselves at the thought of everyone falling over unsold papers the day after the Rags are beaten.
 
Chaos theory: a chimpanzee banging randomly on a typewriter for an indefinite period of time will probably at some point reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare.
Chaos theory refined : a chimpanzee banging randomly on a typewriter for about 10 minutes will certainly produce an edition of the daily mail .
 
I've just been at a meeting with a man who used to be a reporter, not sports, and he was telling me that he gave up when they started to get involved in sensationalising everything and not checking their facts or ignoring the experienced people when they said the information was wrong. He was 7 years short of retirement and found himself another role elsewhere rather than pander to the "lowest common denominator" as he put it.
 
I've just been at a meeting with a man who used to be a reporter, not sports, and he was telling me that he gave up when they started to get involved in sensationalising everything and not checking their facts or ignoring the experienced people when they said the information was wrong. He was 7 years short of retirement and found himself another role elsewhere rather than pander to the "lowest common denominator" as he put it.

A race to the bottom. I've given up on all shit papers, only the independent and guardian have any credibility left.
 
On the Sunday Supplement they were talking about awards the other day. I was completely lost - were they saying that the tabloid journalists weren't represented well or that the broadsheets weren't. I was sort of shocked by the topic...as had absolutely nothing to do with football but I couldn't for the life of me understand their points. I'd genuinely love if someone was watching, got the gist and would like to share.

What I thought I heard one guy say was that the tabloids journalists wrote 10-20 stories a day so deserved praise. But if that was really what he was saying then wouldn't that imply that the dirty f*cker made up 10-20 stories per day as he'd have no effin time to verify anything?

IMO they should be in jail for fraud... along with those f*ckers that wrote Lost.
 
Just remember these twats work for the media, same group who have been through courts for telephone hacking etc.
Full of bullshit. There are more coherent non-biased comments on here that give more of an up to date on football and city.
Well done (not one an all however ;) )
 
Clicks for D###s...

paidtoclick.gif

Haha
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top