You're sounding like the Manure media, didn't want him anyway.
Looks that way, yep. Ric even said that we were preparing for his announcement,Because we haven't spent a lot of money on raw youngs before? Club seems somewhat embarrassed and are briefing media to hide it IMO.
What City want and want I want aren't mutually exclusive.
Never seen more than five minutes footage of Laporte, just plenty of people saying what a prospect he is.
How can I miss what I didn't know what we were getting.
I'm sure City are pissed at the level of time wasted but shit happens and we now have an extra £40m to throw at Alaba!!
And not a flying fuck was given that day.
Don't know enough about him, plenty saying he is the real deal.
Always seemed overkill to me wanting him AND Stones.
At least Stones is homegrown and used to the Premier League.
Fair play to Laporte if he wants to remain loyal, regardless of a pay rise.
As far as I'm concerned, it's £40m we can spend elsewhere, hopefully on a proper left back!!
Can't help it if a player changes his mind right at the death. They post infoBut all the ITK's said its done deal and could be announced this week.
Wonder if that does make that 65m for Aubameyang more achievable though.
Seriously? How much more can Txiki do?
The kid is willingly turning down football at the highest level, trophies, success, Pep Guardiola and double the money to stick around at Bilbao. That's it.
Not doubting you but funny how the media are leaking "we didn't want him anyway" stories. If it was Manure we'd be pissing our sides.
From the "leaks" Iv read, city aren't overly bothered seems the stance. Implying that the deal was offered and if excepted would of been good, but it wasn't and city ain't going to loose sleep.Well he could have brought it home, he's a closer that's his job. The cards were stacked in our favour big time but now we leak "we didn't want him" FFS
was at a doo yesterday with a handful of pros, an ex blue told me Laporte had stalled as stones was done, the Everton pro laughed and said "months ago," I'm not the type to beg for info or look star struck so I just replied I'd heard we were in the market for some quality and was looking forward to next year, the Everton lad replied "for sure, I wish they wanted me". There was a general nod in agreement and end of convo.And not a flying fuck was given that day.
Don't know enough about him, plenty saying he is the real deal.
Always seemed overkill to me wanting him AND Stones.
At least Stones is homegrown and used to the Premier League.
Fair play to Laporte if he wants to remain loyal, regardless of a pay rise.
As far as I'm concerned, it's £40m we can spend elsewhere, hopefully on a proper left back!!
Wasn't arsed until I heard he was earmarked for left back.. Devastated now.
From the "leaks" Iv read, city aren't overly bothered seems the stance. Implying that the deal was offered and if excepted would of been good, but it wasn't and city ain't going to loose sleep.
If he wasn't keen on playing left back that might explain why he preferred to stay...Wasn't arsed until I heard he was earmarked for left back.. Devastated now.
So £51 million for a CB is now too low? Christ. Nothing fishy imoSomething is fishy about this. His new release clause is way too low. They literally raised it by only 10 million. Makes me wonder if something else is going on.
Is this a case of instead of triggering the release we are buying outright for say 45 million. Laporte doesn't have to trigger his clause. He doesn't pay tax on the clause. Bilbao gets an extra 5 million and we pay what we would have anyway in taxes? Unlikely I know...I obviously want this kid.
Not getting Laporte and now City want Toure to stay for next season.. This day is weird!