Magicpole
Well-Known Member
I think the guy was obviously a drug dealer and violent. The question for me is, does this justify just shooting the guy?
Where do we end up with that policy?
I'm amazed that all this stuff if him being such a **** that he wasn't arrested for that with little fuss.
A gun in the car is not the same as pointing it and shooting at them.
We have to look at the bigger picture and resist the American cop policy of shooting first, then shooting again without sufficient cause.
All the family man shite is typical response and who knows he might have been good to his family as many criminals are.
It's the just cause to shoot somebody I want to see, as I think we have to be better than the hit squad mentality of some of the US cops.
If we don't follow legal processes then we are just as bad as all the regimes we continually criticise.
Unless the have oil obviously. Nearly a schoolboy error there.
Where do we end up with that policy?
I'm amazed that all this stuff if him being such a **** that he wasn't arrested for that with little fuss.
A gun in the car is not the same as pointing it and shooting at them.
We have to look at the bigger picture and resist the American cop policy of shooting first, then shooting again without sufficient cause.
All the family man shite is typical response and who knows he might have been good to his family as many criminals are.
It's the just cause to shoot somebody I want to see, as I think we have to be better than the hit squad mentality of some of the US cops.
If we don't follow legal processes then we are just as bad as all the regimes we continually criticise.
Unless the have oil obviously. Nearly a schoolboy error there.