Recent content by rabby

His input is just completely meaningless garbage,shit like "he really shoud have done better there" and "I'll tell you what that's a great effort". Nothing insightful has ever come out of the dullard.

1&2 are interesting points,as things currently stand it's referred to as winning a throw-in but in reality at the point of the throw-in the team in possession are a man down,and therefore more likely to lose possession. Your ideas would reduce the likelihood of this happening.

Fa Fair play to him if anyone is going to recognise a bunch of biased cunts it's Kelvin McKenzie.

Asa Hartford,he was a pep style player while pep was still a muchacho. He had the close control,body movement and vision,top player but Pep could have elevated him to greater heights.

Predictive text mate,it's a bit like Tommy Robinson a bit annoying but not that big a deal.

Cheers pal no offense taken

It really isn't,you're choosing to make it about party politics,you seem unable to separate you're own bigotry from the discussion of the erosion of individuals rights and freedoms. Theres hundreds of videos online of police knocking on people's doors cos someone was called a fat bastard or...

Christ mate it doesn't matter what government brought in what legislation,this is not about party politics. Anyway you don't need to step outside and hurl missiles at the police,a mildly offensive tweet should be enough to have you down the local nick for a few hours grilling.

No just the ones who believe using a terrorism law to obtain information off him is justified,but im sure you already knew that.

All that seems perfectly fine,but do you feel using schedule 7 of the terrorism act is justified here or not,that is what is at the root of this for many people.

Had a look at some of your previous posts and for someone who won't be concerned until it becomes clear that the police have used a questionable method to obtain information,you seem absolutely convinced that that the police will use the not even introduced yet id cards to stop and search.Not...

If you've made lots of noise about the terrorism laws you should be able to work out you're not one of the clowns referred to.

What I think we've learned these past few pages is that Robinson is a rather dislikeable character with a dubious past.He has garnered a loyal following, some of who probably have questionable motives. He also seems to have built up a rather large group of people who have a very strong dislike...

And who's to say they don't have a point. Most people would view the vandalism at RAF Brize Norton as unacceptable but does it drift into the realms of terrorism. It's impossible to find a consensus internationally on what exactly constitutes a terrorist act.

If you went to the bother of looking into the story a bit deeper you would realise it wasn't a straight forward stop. Look if people believe that using the terrorism act to stop someone like Robinson and detain and question him they're entitled to that opinion. I personally believe it's a...