I thought the same. Although he is wrong most of the time he spoke , he came across alright. Makes his tweets and behavior on that platform even more strange
It would be great to get clarification of that.
I’m sick of hearing other fans say that the whole case was 2 1. And that it’s only because we picked 2 of the panel.
Thanks again mate.
So it’s either the entire case or anything from 2017.
I know what your saying about the concealment being hard to prove.
But it’s the burden of proof in this hearing that worries me As it’s not a criminal court , we could be talking about the balance of probability...
Thanks. But if they first learned of a potential fraud in 2018 could they only look back as far as 2012 , or am I not understanding the time barring thing at all. Lol
And for time barring purposes of the panel agrees to treat as fraud , then when did they first have knowledge of it. IE how far back would the 6 years go ?
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.