Recent content by ricky77

  1. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Well according to Nick , you’re his source
  2. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I thought the same. Although he is wrong most of the time he spoke , he came across alright. Makes his tweets and behavior on that platform even more strange
  3. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    City weren’t discussed
  4. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Or else check last few pages when he tells us he’s taken it down :)
  5. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Was this today ? Jordan seemed full pelt on us having a case to answer as recent as yesterday. Has he had another backtrack ?
  6. R

    It's Quiet 18 - Wanna ring the bell?

    You win again ? We beat Madrid again ? Haaland Champs league And now Bellingham ???
  7. R

    Everton (A) - Sun 14th May, 14:00 | Pre-Match Thread

    2 win and 2 draws at the very most enough to win it
  8. R

    Jude Bellingham

    Apologies if I’m being stupid. But Bernie has 2 years left on his contract after this season. Why would he go on a free next year ?
  9. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Yes mate. It’s just the uneducated fans of other clubs who genuinely believe we picked 2
  10. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Brilliant. I’d never thought of it like that at all. Good to know. Thanks for your efforts.
  11. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I know mate. Difficult living in a City were you are ‘the’ City fan and everyone you know supports Liverpool or United.
  12. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    It would be great to get clarification of that. I’m sick of hearing other fans say that the whole case was 2 1. And that it’s only because we picked 2 of the panel.
  13. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Thanks again mate. So it’s either the entire case or anything from 2017. I know what your saying about the concealment being hard to prove. But it’s the burden of proof in this hearing that worries me As it’s not a criminal court , we could be talking about the balance of probability...
  14. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Thanks. But if they first learned of a potential fraud in 2018 could they only look back as far as 2012 , or am I not understanding the time barring thing at all. Lol
  15. R

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    And for time barring purposes of the panel agrees to treat as fraud , then when did they first have knowledge of it. IE how far back would the 6 years go ?

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.