Recent content by slbsn

Not in my view - I think we would be in unsafe decision territory if it happened. The article is here too https://stefanborson.substack.com/p/the-115-decision-doa-before-its-even

There are small group of wholly anonymous posters (and you are definitely in the group) that don't earn respectful replies and are very often not asking in good faith. There are very many that don't have your complaint and most that were here long before 2025. The truth is that people like you...

In order: 1. That isn't what the rules say. In context "as soon as practicable" gives the PL complete cover if they don't have a decision from the Panel. 2. This is normal judicial thinking - an impression is formed of course. Bad judges have pretty much decided on the papers, better ones listen...

No doubt the snipers will be out shortly but just to be clear again. - Nobody knows the outcome of the hearing except the panel. Of course, not impossible the draft came yesterday - but as of Wednesday it hadn't - Parties will have a good feel after the hearing for those issues that were...

No - been waiting because it is tiring taking snipes - don't expect everyone to understand.

Hard to understand this place or many fans. The idea that it is wrong or laughable to tell fellow fans what I believe to be the case based on many conversations (on whatever topic) is just weird. And I am pretty careful what I say and don't say.

I posted on the tickets forum about someone ripping me off and saw someone had misunderstood a prior tweet so answered. Sorry

On the contrary, almost certain that the barrister gets the decision first or at least immediately once received. No analysis is required when Pannick says the decision isn't out and they don't know when it is coming. It is the horse's mouth.

There is zero chance Pannick would misguide or lie.

Yes it happens. But not happened here even if it could and it would be very hard in a PL situation due to how the Sanction Agreement rules work.

No, this is referring to whether IC themselves know their decision. Of course, their view would have been established in or shortly after the hearing (or in some cases/on some points on the papers). But this doesn't mean the written judgment has been finalised but has been held or selectively...

I absolutely didn't say yes - some misunderstanding. How much clearer do you want it than Lord Pannick saying there is no decision yet? I know it isn't good for the thread, but there has been no decision received by the parties.

Have heard that this individual has previous. So stay clear. Sad really.

Just to be aware Champions Again Ole Ole has time and time again (email, DM here and then even on Whatsapp) promised to pay for a ticket I gave him/her for Liverpool LAST season but never comes through. I have even said I will give the money all to charity but this person simply keeps promising...