Recent content by slbsn

  1. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    The risk is real
  2. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Thanks. PS sorry to disappoint but more than happy to advance my career/income streams though (not that 115 in itself has done that)
  3. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Last reply. Believe who and what you like. But I am not making it up.
  4. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Honestly, don't be so naive. Or at least be open minded enough to accept that the club has a plan for some possible negative outcomes even if it is confident it will prevail. Honestly, it is so obvious and basic that I don't know why I have to say it.
  5. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    None of it is welcomed. Not one bit
  6. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Apologies. I didn’t realise anyone on here really believed City “welcomed” this whole fiasco. It’s PR not reality. But sure, take it at face value if it comforts you.
  7. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    This is my final reply to this crap. Believe what you like. Believe who you like. Believe I speak to a range of people to get as clear a picture as possible or believe I make it all up. Your call. But if you think the only time Pannick has engaged in a year on this topic is to reply to Paladin...
  8. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I never said they did publicly. But surely you can’t be that naive - there is a difference between PR and the real world. Only fools would foresee no risk at all.
  9. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    MAY say
  10. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I’ve said that. Almost no chance of anything but a high award of our costs (which means 90%) unless the Commission says the claim was baseless and brought in bad faith. Which is something it won’t say.
  11. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I never said that. But likewise I’m hardly likely to tell you who I speak to. But it’s not just one individual that acknowledges there is risk that some things go against the club. And anyone that didn’t recognise that risk wouldn’t be credible anyway.
  12. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I don't reply to every question. And the answer to this one is pretty obvious.
  13. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    Comfort yourself however you like. What I’ve written is fact on not just based on generalisations. City are confident but not certain or complacent.
  14. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I said City are confident. I mentioned soft signals multiple times in the past. They are confident. But they don't KNOW and acknowledge the decision may say things they don't like.
  15. S

    PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

    I don't think so. I still have no idea what you meant above.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top