Alexis Sanchez

[chaddblue]

The press have got it all wrong. It's actually Sterling + £15m to West Brom for Evans

 

[Cobwebcat]

If it weren't for Evans I'd laugh at this story.

I'll believe anything might be the truth now.

 

[Neville Kneville]

The Sterling angle only works if Sterling wants the move for personal/professional reasons and if Arsenal want the player otherwise it goes nowhere. If Sterling wants the move then fine. Personally I would prefer to keep both but if a player wants out and you can replace him with a player that wants in then I don't have an issue with it.

Of course.

Bacause also, that would mean he is clinically insane, so get rid.

 

[BertTrautmann'sParachute]

The lol on the end was me laughing at the story mate

I know. It was a general comment mate.

 

[bellwhaft]

I think Pep is building for the future, overall.

In Pep's eyes, bringing Sanchez in would 'guarantee' short-term success, at the same time allowing the younger players to develop.

 

[balotelli's back pocket]

In case i didn't make myself clear.
FUCK OFF FUCK OFF FUCK OFF NO NO NO NO NO

This would be the worst transfer ever.

 

[jrb]

Why would Sterling want to lave City?

Look at his joy at scoring on Sunday.

And why to Arsenal?

A club and team going nowhere.

 

[bellsouth]

This story has suddenly gone mainstream, I wish someone form the club would knock it on the head asap.
Sanchez would be an excellent signing but sacrificing Sterling would be so short-termism. We want a team for the next 5 years, not just a sh*t or bust approach to this season.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

Are we really considering this? Doesnt it affect our british quotient or whatever?

 

[doobyedoobye]

In the current transfer climate there is a strong case to say sterling is worth more than sanchez

Exactly this