blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 27,435
I'd step away from that can of worms if I was you :)I liked Mancini, sorry to see him sacked. If we had of brought Maureen in, I'd of binned off my SC. I can't stand him.
I'd step away from that can of worms if I was you :)I liked Mancini, sorry to see him sacked. If we had of brought Maureen in, I'd of binned off my SC. I can't stand him.
This is so true. United are a dinosaur club from the dressing room to the boardroom. The Glazers have hardly invested anything in the infrastructure. The organisation is built for failure. The model is based on taking as much money out as possible with short-term transfer purchases based more on a quick headlline in Asia than any long-term vision. It's brilliant to watch it happening. The only risk for us City fans is a big takeover from someone with deep pockets but the Glazers will hang on to their cash cow for years because they have so much debt they have no choice. Happy days.
The United Way :)It's a back me with loads of cash to buy more shit or sack me plea.
Lol he wouldHe would have sold Sergio and a few others and replaced them with Ryan Shawcross.
Looks like he's saved himself.I'm confused, are we saving him or not ?
I'm confused, are we saving him or not ?
we have to save him,if they get close to us then we'll have to devise a plan to nobble him insteadI'm confused, are we saving him or not ?
Agree with this. When Swales was at City he allowed the structure of the club to disintegrate without putting any money in. Instead we spent money on flamboyant signings like Kevin Reeves, Steve Daley etc. But it was all desperation to try and keep up with the Rags and placate the fans. Now the boot is on the other foot. It's time for the laughing policeman song!Quite right. To my mind United are now an upmarket version of what City were in the Swales era. Being run by people who have no real interest in investing in the club. It's great.