Has she a point?

This is why I insist on only going to Village People concerts. I fucking love it when they sing YMCA.

1g66g.jpg
brilliant....in a thread filled with brilliance, and for the record she's a twunt
 
So if the mother is deaf why does she need to someone to sign for her, does she like the music and if so how does she know. Not as if it's Dylan their going to see where the lyrics might actually mean something.

Stop talking sense. Anyway, it's something to do with equal access. I used to know someone who was deaf and he just used to enjoy the music being played by feeling the beat through the floor.
This woman, however, just sounds like she was out to be offended. They did what she asked but still offended
.
.
 
Stop talking sense. Anyway, it's something to do with equal access. I used to know someone who was deaf and he just used to enjoy the music being played by feeling the beat through the floor.
This woman, however, just sounds like she was out to be offended. They did what she asked but still offended
.
.
It all seems so unedifying, where does it stop?
 
Are you relaying info from a different article? (genuine question). I can't see anywhere that she tried to have the concert stopped (and let's be honest, it would never in a million years have come to that).

She took out an injunction to force them provide it. The fact the promoter backed down before the hearing suggests to me they knew they were failing to comply with the law. All of those added extras were also only offered when they finally agreed to the interpreter.

Offering her a carer pass falls short IMO. I think it's unreasonable to expect her (or indeed every single deaf person at every concert) to have acess to someone who can provide that specialised service. Makes much more sense that promoters provide this as standard or on request (providing enough warning is given ) and then also any deaf child or parent wanting to attend can benefit.

Personally, whether people think she's ungrateful or a busy body or whatever, this will probs set a precedent now and other families won't have to fight for it and therefore might feel more able to attend things like this. A positive outcome if you ask me.

I stand corrected, the court order was, as you say to provide a signer, I read it the other day and did not re-check but my point still stands, they offered her a free ticket so that she could have her own signer, I cannot see anything wrong with that, it too me was a sensible and honest response. i guess we will just have to disagree.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.