Leaked England team and press reaction

None are exempt in this country,no matter which paper or media outlet,always looking for dirt,used to mainly be the normal world news,but it is in sport as well these days.

People say,such and such is ok,and he's alright (as he may have wrote something positive about City once) but truth is they all piss in the same pot,and quite frankly are arseholes who think they are special for some reason
 
There's often this thing about how is the Daily Mail so powerful when only just over a million people actually read it. And the reason is that so many other journalists think that "Daily Mail writes a story" is news. So they put a story on their front page, and that dictates the headlines on every other media source for the next week. And it's partly because nobody does any proper reporting any more, they just write about what people are talking about. Guaranteed column inches/air time with minimal effort.
 
Regardless of the rights or wrongs of it (and the fact that it looks like it was the incorrect line-up anyway), the sheer indignation and arrogance in the reaction of journalists on Twitter over the last few days has been quite something. Their sense of self-importance and seemingly knows no bounds, and shows just how out of touch with ordinary fans many of them are nowadays.

The most amazing thing was them acting like they had the journalists equivalent of the hippocratic oath, and they were morally bound to report a news story if they got it.
 
There's often this thing about how is the Daily Mail so powerful when only just over a million people actually read it. And the reason is that so many other journalists think that "Daily Mail writes a story" is news.

The Mail Online is the most read English language news website in the world. That's why they're so powerful, 12 million unique visitors per day.
 
The Mail Online is the most read English language news website in the world. That's why they're so powerful, 12 million unique visitors per day.
Yeah, but the Mail Online isn't particularly bad compared to the newspaper. Mainly celebrity bollocks. It's not the website that often drives the media narrative, it's the newspaper.

Just to clarify though, it's the most read newspaper website, not news website. The BBC has more UK visitors that the Mail has worldwide. In the UK, the BBC has a 30% market share, the Mail has 6.6%.
 
Over the past couple of months, journos, twitter ones especially, have made themselves look even worse than they already did. They also seem to have a complete lack of self-awareness, judging by their own responses to the response.
 
Regardless of the rights or wrongs of it (and the fact that it looks like it was the incorrect line-up anyway), the sheer indignation and arrogance in the reaction of journalists on Twitter over the last few days has been quite something. Their sense of self-importance and seemingly knows no bounds, and shows just how out of touch with ordinary fans many of them are nowadays.

Great doc' on the beeb the other night about, and featuring, all the England managers. They discussed the press quite a lot and had an editor from one of the dailies fighting his case for slaughtering managers. The mans arrogance and entitlement was staggering. Here's the link. Think the journo crops up around the McClaren period.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0b7jcqv
 
Sky sources understands.
Hate that phrase so much.
Does that mean there is a mole in a camp or purely guesswork?
Either way the press shouldn't be coming out with these headlines in the build up to the match, it's ridiculous.
They have a mole. Players and ex players,now pundits in same agencies pass on details to show they are ITK.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.