So is he in London now ?
This is the very definition of a WUM posting something to get a reaction. As for the whole episode De Launentis has shown his dislike for our club time and time again and dealing with him was always going to be problematic and I wonder if we just a little under prepared for the shenanigans and machinations which were always going to be in play. Lessons to be learned and move on.
This.
Not the end of the world mate. If we don't sign a DM, we have several options to cover Fernandinho. Gundogan Delph and possibly Stones.
Too demanding I think. What do you think?Can Vinnie play there too??
...De Launentis has shown his dislike for our club time and time again and dealing with him was always going to be problematic and I wonder if we just a little under prepared for the shenanigans and machinations which were always going to be in play. Lessons to be learned and move on.
So you're actually agreeing with True Blue then ;)
Seriously?
What part of other clubs thinking we aren't in control of our transfers do you think is a good thing?
Reputation is everything, as our owners continually attempt to stress.
The debate isn't about our integrity, it's about people employed on behalf of our club to do their jobs correctly, using their supposed expertise.
Txiki can get it wrong, the people paid to protect and advise him and our other negotiators, their job is not to advertise they might have got it wrong in the first place.
Sorry for me labouring my point, but I would expect to be sacked if I had chosen to brief such a thing, when simply advising saying nothing and playing with a straight bat would have avoided any possible outcome of the transfer.
Too demanding I think. What do you think?