You're not being thick mate, there's absolutely zero relevance. The journalist is the one being thick and/or dishonest.Maybe I'm thick, but how does the recent revelations about the FFP (Der Speigel) hamper our ability to spend money on this guy? We are currently complying with FFP and nothing has happened with regards to the revelations so why would we not have the cash?
You're not being thick mate, there's absolutely zero relevance. The journalist is the one being thick and/or dishonest.
And having made only one major signing last summer there will be plenty of money available this time around.
I could understand Mbappe staying in France and moving to PSG but I don't think de Jong would be well served making that move. Hard to believe that City aren't still in with a serious chance.
We need to stop being pussies in the transfer forum!!!!
You're not being thick mate, there's absolutely zero relevance. The journalist is the one being thick and/or dishonest.
They can't knock down sponsors they signed off on in 2014 even if they wanted to and there's nothing on our current accounts to touch.If we think they’re gonna show up with auditors and attempt to knock down sponsorship valuations because of ADUG payments behind the scenes we theoretically could have to worry about ongoing compliance. I don’t think they’ll have a leg to stand on in regards to what we already made an agreement about so if they are going to come after us it’ll be on our current accounts IMO
BottlerEredivisie to Ligue 1...
What's "tool" in Dutch?