White heterosexual male wins discrimination case.

Exactly ... no way should somebody be deemed 'better suited' to a role based not on their ability to do it, but which gender they like to stick their dick/dildo in.
Or which gender they like sticking them with their dick/dildo. Have to cover all bases.
 
The best person for the job should always get the job and no other considerations should come into it. It's as simple as that.

If that means a whole work force is completely white middle class males, or all females, or a mix of females/males/white British/black British/East Asian/white Eastern European/white Irish/Somalian immigrant who got citizenship then it shouldn't matter if every person in every role was the best/most suitable person interviewed/headhunted.

Nobody should ever get a position just because they tick a box for diversity and no people in positions of power or media should call for more diversity in a work place or a panel if the people employed were the right people for the job.

I think it was Garth Crooks who complained that there wasn't enough diversity in the England World Cup bid panel. But he never considered whether the people who got the roles were the best person.
 
The problem here, is the decades of noninclusive actions by the police force with its systemic racism of the past acting as a measure for BAME citizens not to apply. This is (if true) why the bar has been set lower; to encourage more people of an ethnic background to participate.

It doesn't help that 'positive discrimination' is an actual thing.

What would have helped would have been the rooting out of the 'bad apples in the barrel' and the learning of different cultures to ease the 'clashing' earlier on in the recruitment of BAME citizens in the 60's, 70's, 80's. I doubt you see 'positive discrimination' as a thing if that happened.

This is the MET's own problem; I mean how would Cheshire police still have had an all White force in 2015...??

It's fooking ridiculous when you just think about that in isolation.

I'm expecting the usual Hate Mob to respond, so let's get on with it...

I agree with you tbh, serious questions have to be asked why it was still a white only police force, being Cheshire I bet it was masonic as fuck too.
 
I agree with you tbh, serious questions have to be asked why it was still a white only police force, being Cheshire I bet it was masonic as fuck too.

Cheshire has a 98% white demographic and a 97.6% white police force, so it reflects the Cheshire population. There isn't any masonic racist hidden agenda, the information is out there. In the news this week the diversity specialists were complaining that they wanted London to be policed by 40% minorities to reflect Londons changing population and nothing was said about that.

Would you like Cheshire to bus in BAME people to fill the quota? Really?
 
Cheshire has a 98% white demographic and a 97.6% white police force, so it reflects the Cheshire population. There isn't any masonic racist hidden agenda, the information is out there. In the news this week the diversity specialists were complaining that they wanted London to be policed by 40% minorities to reflect Londons changing population and nothing was said about that.

Would you like Cheshire to bus in BAME people to fill the quota? Really?

You aren't allowed to work in your area as a copper are you? So wouldn't police from other areas that have a higher BAME demographic be able to work in Cheshire?
 
You aren't allowed to work in your area as a copper are you? So wouldn't police from other areas that have a higher BAME demographic be able to work in Cheshire?
Not sure about Cheshire but I know a couple of people who work for Staffordshire police who live in Staffordshire.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.