Man Utd could have blown us out of the water.

Baconface spent MILLIONS keeping them ahead of their rivals and Chelsea and Arsenal and others could not compete......how long ago were Ferdinand and Rooney signed at circa £30million??? Don't be like the journalists and media who believe the Trafford myth-making machine that they never really spent that much
 
their going to get screwed over now every time the want a player,they are desperate and the club selling knows it,city to a certain degree are self sufficient with the younger players coming through and the links we have with other clubs,we will still have to spend big now and again but come back to this thread in 5 years and i'l guarantee you united would have splashed 10-15 times more than city with city winning more titles and cups etc
 
i got a good one to really piss them off over the road

if you are NOW so big after the domination of football from the 1990s and 2000 why have you got nothing to show for it other than £500 million in debt ??? and that is with the youth setup that produced the class of 1992 and so many talents ?? who fooling who here ?? saying without money it would little old city hahaha

city going down with a £billion in the bank billion in the bank billion in the bank
city going down with a £billion in the bank billion in the bank billion in the bank
 
their going to get screwed over now every time the want a player,they are desperate and the club selling knows it,city to a certain degree are self sufficient with the younger players coming through and the links we have with other clubs,we will still have to spend big now and again but come back to this thread in 5 years and i'l guarantee you united would have splashed 10-15 times more than city with city winning more titles and cups etc

they can only flog the dead horse for so long
 
The reason they have fucked up, is because they allowed a greedy Scotsman to pretty much take over the running of the club, because they believed he & they were close to unstoppable & that City were irrelevant.

They ended up with the Glazers & Sam Ollerdyce & we've got the Sheikh & Guardiola.

The next thing they will realise, is that future support worldwide, is also up for grabs, just like the trophies
 
Paying DDG 400K a week is good business sense. For them to get a player of his calibre as replacement would cost them just as much in transfer fees. If it was the Warrington rat that they were offering daft money too then you could agree that they were distorting the market.
Couldn't disagree more,how is it good business sense to pay him 400k a week when he is on the decline? it would be much cheaper to sell him and buy a keeper that gives them more options on half the wages,all they have done has opened the door for all the others to demand huge wage increases,it's no wonder it's a toxic place to be,was giving sanchez 400k a week good business?,they are not thinking it through,it's the worst way to run a business
 
The reason they have fucked up, is because they allowed a greedy Scotsman to pretty much take over the running of the club, because they believed he & they were close to unstoppable & that City were irrelevant.

They ended up with the Glazers & Sam Ollerdyce & we've got the Sheikh & Guardiola.

The next thing they will realise, is that future support worldwide, is also up for grabs, just like the trophies

Or put slightly differently, the trophies will grab future support worldwide.
 
Paying DDG 400K a week is good business sense. For them to get a player of his calibre as replacement would cost them just as much in transfer fees. If it was the Warrington rat that they were offering daft money too then you could agree that they were distorting the market.

5/6 year deal at 400k is not good business. Especially on the back of the season he had with the Rags and Spain.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.