Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
It's a fact because there is empirical evidence for the heart being a muscle which pumps blood around the body.
I have yet to see any empirical evidence for religion.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Evidence for religion
- Thread starter Le Havre Oswald
- Start date
I have yet to see any empirical evidence for religion.
The how I was inferring was the mechanism of creation (science), the why was reason for it (religion).
why religion? philosophical debate is not the sole domain of the clergy
BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
The clergy is a facade for some who's sole interest is molesting Innocent kids: (why religion? philosophical debate is not the sole domain of the clergy
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
Blimey...! As I have said to you previously, each to their own, what gives you comfort is your affair, however, your inane rambling and denial regarding the anatomy and physiology of the human body does absolutely zero to further your cause, you call me out for not buying into your religious fantasy, yet deny completely what is clearly a fact regarding the function of both the heart and brain within the body. It is utterly pointless going any further with you on this as you continue to spout stuff that you have made up, whilst denying incontrovertible, empirical evidence.Yeah the mind that that is closed to heart can only see heart as a mechanical pump - that is the way it thinks. That mind tends to think of itself as a master of the universe but, in being closed to the essence of the universe, it probably isn't such a great master after all. But, hey, enjoy its rewards that's not a problem - but it will keep keep one in ignorance of the treasures of the heart. And, yeah that same mind will call anything that is a threat to it's dominion crazy or unscientific or loco or nonsense or lacking evidence or whatever - that's just the way it is. If that's the way you want to live, then great - but to insist that others cannot and have not opened to an awareness of heart beyond just a pump, on the basis that that you are unwilling to be even remotely open...well, your choice, but not for me thanks.
Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 9,595
I didn’t say it was. I just said I didn’t think science would ever explain the why and that it concentrates on the mechanism of creation.why religion? philosophical debate is not the sole domain of the clergy
I didn’t say it was. I just said I didn’t think science would ever explain the why and that it concentrates on the mechanism of creation.
you certainly intimated it by citing it
Elbow beards
Well-Known Member
Your wasting your time mate, I've tried before and got nowhere. I think he lives in a cuckoo clock. Crazy loco.Blimey...! As I have said to you previously, each to their own, what gives you comfort is your affair, however, your inane rambling and denial regarding the anatomy and physiology of the human body does absolutely zero to further your cause, you call me out for not buying into your religious fantasy, yet deny completely what is clearly a fact regarding the function of both the heart and brain within the body. It is utterly pointless going any further with you on this as you continue to spout stuff that you have made up, whilst denying incontrovertible, empirical evidence.
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
Fuck I know mate, I think he's getting blocked by me, can't be doing with folk like him...!Your wasting your time mate, I've tried before and got nowhere. I think he lives in a cuckoo clock. Crazy loco.
That ignore button is a godsend ;-)
Mancity1980
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2011
- Messages
- 9,595
you certainly intimated it by citing it
No I didn’t. What is this? Point scoring?How life started is of great interest to modern science and with further exploration of space it may be solved particularly if we find other examples of it.
Before the Big Bang there was nothing, no particles, antiparticles, radiation or time itself. The latter point rendering the question redundant.
Personally I think the question of the why will never be solved by science and for people who happily combine science and religion they let science concentrate on the how and religion answer the why.
No I didn’t. What is this? Point scoring?
no mate not at all, your words - "and religion answer the why." all i asked was why religion, if you see that as point scoring then i give up