This is true.
Being debt free is over rated. If the mortgage is cheap and affordable from her monthly income, as it’s such a small amount outstanding then leaving it in place is an attractive option.
Whilst paying off a mortgage is great, property is highly illiquid when compared with savings/investments. Proper advice would depend on her capacity and appetite for risk (there’s a risk in involved in everything, from cautious investments having the risk of inflation eroding capital overtime through to systemic and institutional risk in classic direct equity holdings).
Again her timescales are very important here. If she wants to spend the money in five years, the above here is correct, if she’s retiring in twenty years and funds are there for that time, then Brexit is completely immaterial over the long term. She can also invest in “Brexit risk-free” investments or funds (such as FTSE 100 companies that make their turnover worldwide in the US Dollar trading in oil/gas/tobacco/pharmaceuticals etc) as they’re likely to be largely unaffected by whatever our wanker politicians do at home.
She also has the option of investing in other jurisdictions that are going to be unaffected by Brexit such as emerging markets or North America.
Again, time frame and appetite for risk are the key details that would be needed to give correct advice to her.
This is true of cash on deposit, in reality, after the separation of retail and investment banking post 2008, depositor protection on cash isn’t really needed if she’s with a major high street bank. The government showed they won’t let a major bank fold (not that one would due to the retail/investment separation and liquidity requirements) as it would kill confidence in the industry.
@stonerblue the tax wrapper (ISA/unit trust/bond) would depend on her personal circumstances, aims and goals bud b