SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,229
According to var, there hadn’t been a single clear and obvious error in 28 matches.clear and obvious error
It’s useless.
According to var, there hadn’t been a single clear and obvious error in 28 matches.clear and obvious error
Have Liverpool been on the recieving end yet?If you believe it’s bent then why do you even bother?
Can you tell me, if it’s bent, then why has no decision on a penalty been overturned in 29 matches rather than just us? Or is that to make it less obvious as well?
As for 3 in 3 being suspect, was it or was it not a penalty on McTominay (sp?) yesterday?
You’re talking biased crap. Every set of fans (just about) hates var already, everyone thinks it’s screwing them and that’s after 3 games. I’m sure it will be unanimous by game week 15. Var is absolutely not fit for purpose and their rules on ‘clear and obvious’ just have to change. But that doesn’t mean that City are the one and only target and saying that is the case is pure paranoia.
Yeah but sure the refs needed more help
Not yet no. But having watched all three of their games, there hasn’t been call for it yet. I’m hope they’re saving theirs up for a truly bad time.Have Liverpool been on the recieving end yet?
No consistency whatsoever
Oi fuck off sweep,giving them 5 pens in 3 games would have been a bit obvious,3 in 3 is already suspect
This. So VAR is not eliminating fuck ups but ruling out goals for armpits being 5mm offside.System put in place to eliminate fuck ups.
Doesn't eliminate fuck ups.
What's the point?