If I am at work and I see a colleague make a mistake I either tell him and let him correct it or I ignore it, if I ignore it you have to ask why I did that. If my work team consists of 20 people in a tight knit group and we all agree that should we see a mistake we will not point it out but in fact agree with our colleagues decision I would say there is a very real problem with corruption. Corruption does not need to be about money, we would be acting corruptly because we are deliberately altering the correct outcome.
That is basically what PiGMOL are doing. Rather than go against their colleague they are agreeing with him no matter what the photographic evidence is stating and to me that shows there is a real problem because then one individual can manufacture results knowing no one will over rule him.
That is basically what PiGMOL are doing. Rather than go against their colleague they are agreeing with him no matter what the photographic evidence is stating and to me that shows there is a real problem because then one individual can manufacture results knowing no one will over rule him.