Ole says Lingard isn’t a goal scorer but he has other attributes.
Didn’t elaborate on what they were though, oddly enough.
Doesn’t score and has less assists for them than Di Maria, for an attacking midfielder.
At least he has potential, at the age of 26
Lingard could easily be an extra in Harry Potter... So much fuss made about this prick, he's not declined over the last few years, hes always been shite..!Ole says Lingard isn’t a goal scorer but he has other attributes.
Didn’t elaborate on what they were though, oddly enough.
Doesn’t score and has less assists for them than Di Maria, for an attacking midfielder.
At least he has potential, at the age of 26
Lingard could easily be an extra in Harry Potter... So much fuss made about this prick, he's not declined over the last few years, hes always been shite..!
Ole says Lingard isn’t a goal scorer but he has other attributes.
Didn’t elaborate on what they were though, oddly enough.
Doesn’t score and has less assists for them than Di Maria, for an attacking midfielder.
At least he has potential, at the age of 26
I like your thinking Tony!I sort of hope the Greenwood scores a few soon. They'll be convinced that he's the next Rooney. But he wont be so just another 18 months of wasted time and confused strategy.
The FA and it's shite selection process will always include rag and dipper players - not sure why you seem so surprised.
I'm not surprised at all. Just a bit weary of the whole relentless process.
They only look at short-term game a raggy player will sell more England shirts than a Wolves player but if England actually won something & competed they'd make much more money but are afraid to take a gamble and yes I know we went far in the WC but let's be honest we didn't play anyone really.and yet the FA wonder why we are not turning up at Wembley in our droves to watch a team picked because of who they play for.