stonerblue
Well-Known Member
You tell him mate, cheeky fucker.I’ll do what I like thanks
You tell him mate, cheeky fucker.I’ll do what I like thanks
Exactly mate, the Newcastle one is clear as day. It’s not intentional at all as it comes off the defenders head on to his arm, however it then falls directly to the Newcastle player to score. Dermot tried claiming it wasn’t visible in real-time and from the camera angles VAR saw and that they weren’t “looking for handball”, absolute bollocks. Laporte’s wasn’t visible in real-time and I’ve still not seen conclusive proof it even hit Laporte’s arm/hand.
It’s as clear proof as anyone could ever wish to see of corruption in the game.
That's true as well; I still haven't actually seen a clear decisive shot of the ball hitting Laporte's arm, I've just assumed it did as it looks like it must have & they said it did.
But in cricket for example, without the actual conclusive shot, they wouldn't overturn the original decision.
Add to that the fact it didn't actually 'control' the ball, go to a City player or lead to a direct scoring opportunity anyhow.
It's a fucking stitch up & we've been docked two points.
Come on, guys, they've got to give the Dippers a bit of daylight! They're gonna go through the season with ne'er a blip now! Season's over!
Come on, guys, they've got to give the Dippers a bit of daylight! They're gonna go through the season with ne'er a blip now! Season's over!
We might get a far Eastern betting syndicate decides Liverpool need to lose, when they play us & Jon Moss in the box, y never know.
and some dreams come true."a new winner every six years"
Scudamore's Dream.