Cancelo Ferna Stones Mendy.
So basically with this we will be playing with 2 at the back
Cancelo Ferna Stones Mendy.
When Kevin doesn’t play we zig zag up the pitch and have a slower build up (won the quad without him). When he plays, the side to side passing doesn’t last as long as when he gets the ball he drives at the defence and we look more dynamic. Obvious stuff. City with and without Kevin are two different teams. As a team we’re like a coiled spring - more spring when Kevin plays.
We have conceded chances against most teams we have played against during the last few seasons.
Most of the time they have cocked them up & we have scored freely at the other end. But on the days we didn't get away with it, we have crashed out of Champions Leagues, & almost lost titles.
All of those games have involved truly awful defending, rather than being undone by brilliance from the opposition.
We have a weakness in that area which people like to ignore & it's time we worked on solving it imo, rather than just concentrating on passing & attacking.
We were also arrogant v Norwich imo, playing both the slow duffers plus old Dave, in the same team with a newly returning Stones & the unpredictable Otamendi, with no Fernandinho.
Rodri is great but he doesn't yet do the coalface defending & by playing the non existent Gundogan in place of a creative or defensive mid, we weaken ourselves at both ends.
Imo, Rodri is better than Gudogan in every aspect of football apart from maybe free kicks, so we could play him in place of the German Ray Wilkins & still get Fern in the team to help protect the useless Zinchenko.
Rather odd way to criticize somebody, after all, even a bad blow job still gets results and makes me feel good. Ottamendi did neither.I suppose it was too much for him to say “Otamendi should have a been a blow job and Stones wasn’t much better.”